Re: [Geopriv] LIS Discovery
Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com> Tue, 10 June 2008 04:12 UTC
Return-Path: <geopriv-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: geopriv-archive@megatron.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-geopriv-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9323A6A74; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:12:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69873A6A74 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HtzqhEcgKy-7 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.bbn.com (mx12.bbn.com [128.33.0.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3EA3A6A64 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jun 2008 21:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.89.253.47] (helo=[127.0.0.1]) by mx12.bbn.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <rbarnes@bbn.com>) id 1K5vDz-0002Rl-4c; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:12:47 -0400
Message-ID: <484DFF3D.9050500@bbn.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:12:45 -0400
From: Richard Barnes <rbarnes@bbn.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Thomson, Martin" <Martin.Thomson@andrew.com>
References: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF1046EF7BC@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
In-Reply-To: <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF1046EF7BC@AHQEX1.andrew.com>
Cc: GEOPRIV WG <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] LIS Discovery
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/private/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: geopriv-bounces@ietf.org
Martin, I'll bring back two issues I had raised before (I'll even keep the numbers!): 2. We need to make sure that there's not a conflict between the DHCP option in this document and draft-ietf-geopriv-dhcp-lbyr-uri-option. The risk here is that since HELD is being proposed as a deref protocol, you end up with two non-interoperable ways to distribute a HELD LbyR. What I would propose is an applicability statement for the URI saying that it should be dereferenced using the "LCP version" of HELD, as in draft-ietf-geopriv-http-location-delivery, not the "deref version" of HELD. 3. I think that the reverse DNS technique in Section 4.2 be removed in favor of a set of implementation guidelines that says essentially "IF you want discovery to work, you MUST provide DHCP option 15 and you MUST put out U-NAPTR records for every domain so distributed." This is appropriate because this document is about actions taken by BOTH the endpoint and access network ("discovery" is a misnomer, since the access network has to participate, either via DHCP or U-NAPTR). For reference, previous message was: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv/current/msg05577.html> --Richard Thomson, Martin wrote: > Having just realised that there are three days left on this draft before > it expires, I thought I'd do due diligence and update it. I'm not aware > of anything that needs changing; let me know if you know otherwise. > > In checking references, I have discovered that > draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-opt-dnsdomain has long expired. This isn't > unprecedented for DHC drafts. My preference is to remove the normative > reference entirely. Since an informative reference isn't much use to > anyone, I'll just remove the paragraph that depends on it while I'm at > it. Sing out if you have a better plan. > > Ta, > Martin > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This message is for the designated recipient only and may > contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. > If you have received it in error, please notify the sender > immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of > this email is prohibited. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > [mf2] > > _______________________________________________ > Geopriv mailing list > Geopriv@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv > > _______________________________________________ Geopriv mailing list Geopriv@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
- [Geopriv] LIS Discovery Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] LIS Discovery Richard Barnes
- Re: [Geopriv] LIS Discovery Thomson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] LIS Discovery Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] LIS Discovery James M. Polk
- Re: [Geopriv] LIS Discovery Dawson, Martin
- Re: [Geopriv] LIS Discovery Richard Barnes