Re: [Geopriv] Consensus call: Adoption of draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-04

We're going to go ahead with the (rough) consensus that we have on  
this one, acknowledging that text changes can and will likely be made  
before WGLC, and that the updated milestone is restricted to the first- 
party case.

Alissa

On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:24 PM, Brian Rosen wrote:

> Is there an alternative document that you want to use as a basis for  
> the milestone?
>
> Brian
>
> On Jan 25, 2011, at 3:43 AM, Hannes Tschofenig wrote:
>
>> I argued that the chosen approach is not the one I would like to  
>> see moving forward, and the description in the document replicates  
>> text we already have in other documents.
>>
>> In that sense I do not want this document as a WG item.
>>
>> On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:
>>
>>> Now that we have a milestone to "submit recommendations for LIS  
>>> discovery conducted by hosts behind residential gateways as  
>>> Informational," I'd like to call for WG adoption of draft-thomson- 
>>> geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-04. Please respond to the list by  
>>> January 19, 2011 about adopting this document as a WG item.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Alissa
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Geopriv mailing list
>>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Geopriv mailing list
>> Geopriv@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv
>
>