IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Geopriv] Consensus call: Adoption of draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-04

Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net> Tue, 25 January 2011 08:41 UTC

Return-Path: <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7AA3A63D2 for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:41:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.556
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.556 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.043, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VaLhduR+IJ6Z for <geopriv@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:41:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 253D93A6B81 for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Tue, 25 Jan 2011 00:41:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 25 Jan 2011 08:44:39 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO [10.255.133.16]) [192.100.123.77] by mail.gmx.net (mp007) with SMTP; 25 Jan 2011 09:44:39 +0100
X-Authenticated: #29516787
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX188r2s8ApE8x0JOure5JHSUxoLIOIFEC+gsfs5QWj 0X69HbGYA9oTV1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Hannes Tschofenig <Hannes.Tschofenig@gmx.net>
In-Reply-To: <020BBF4F-8D14-4EC1-831D-C6246D410045@cdt.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 10:43:22 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <261D150A-01D4-4444-80FE-A5BBF1DE7174@gmx.net>
References: <020BBF4F-8D14-4EC1-831D-C6246D410045@cdt.org>
To: Alissa Cooper <acooper@cdt.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Cc: geopriv@ietf.org, Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] Consensus call: Adoption of draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-04
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:41:46 -0000

I argued that the chosen approach is not the one I would like to see moving forward, and the description in the document replicates text we already have in other documents. 

In that sense I do not want this document as a WG item. 

On Jan 12, 2011, at 4:18 PM, Alissa Cooper wrote:

> Now that we have a milestone to "submit recommendations for LIS discovery conducted by hosts behind residential gateways as Informational," I'd like to call for WG adoption of draft-thomson-geopriv-res-gw-lis-discovery-04. Please respond to the list by January 19, 2011 about adopting this document as a WG item.
> 
> Thanks,
> Alissa
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email