Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] draft-george-ecrit-lamp-post-00]

Robins George <robinsg@huawei.com> Thu, 26 February 2009 00:40 UTC

Return-Path: <robinsg@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46D763A6B85; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:40:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.021
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.021 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.526, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uiWCEFGSw15r; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com (unknown [119.145.14.65]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472603A6B1B; Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:40:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KFN007YTDVGK2@szxga02-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:40:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.12]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0KFN005J5DVGQC@szxga02-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:40:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [10.85.203.87] by szxml05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0KFN00EDVDVG8P@szxml05-in.huawei.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:40:28 +0800 (CST)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 08:40:30 +0800
From: Robins George <robinsg@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <f77644530902251226v2cc6009u73741d357540be85@mail.gmail.com>
To: Karl Heinz Wolf <khwolf1@gmail.com>
Message-id: <49A5E4FE.3000603@huawei.com>
Organization: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
References: <49A4B9D6.9040805@huawei.com> <E51D5B15BFDEFD448F90BDD17D41CFF1056FE664@AHQEX1.andrew.com> <f77644530902251226v2cc6009u73741d357540be85@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: GEOPRIV <geopriv@ietf.org>, ECRIT IETF <ecrit@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] [Ecrit] draft-george-ecrit-lamp-post-00]
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: robinsg@huawei.com
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 00:40:19 -0000

I 'd prefer using the PIDF-LO IANA procedure for adding a new element 
for lamp posts.
I think that re-using the address code is probably not a particularly 
good idea.

-robins

Karl Heinz Wolf wrote:
> Wouldn't the ADDCODE (Additional Code) element be a good place for the
> lamp number code?
>
> karl heinz
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Winterbottom, James
> <James.Winterbottom@andrew.com> wrote:
>   
>> A couple of things.
>>
>> First this should be posted to geopriv and ecrit.
>>
>> Secondly, could these not be covered by the LOC and landmark fields?
>>
>> Cheers
>> James
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ecrit-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ecrit-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
>> Of Robins George
>> Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2009 2:24 PM
>> To: ECRIT IETF
>> Subject: [Ecrit] draft-george-ecrit-lamp-post-00]
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have submitted a draft which describes an extension to civic location
>> format and
>> adds new element PN (pole number). PN carries utility and lamp post
>> number
>> information which can identify a civic location.
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-george-ecrit-lamp-post-00
>>
>> Comments are appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Robins.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>