Re: [Geopriv] "A Uniform Resource Identifier for Geographic Locations ('geo' URI)"

Section 6.2. reads a slightly different version of the not yet finished 
attempt to standardize 
http://www.potaroo.net/ietf/all-ids/draft-daviel-html-geo-tag-05.txt and 
Section 6.3 sounds like an incomplete SIP Location Conveyance approach.

The argument of the document that existing mechanisms "don't provide a 
generic way to protocol independent location identification." seems 
pretty dubious given that the URI definition alone does not provide 
enough semantic (unless you read all the way through Section 6 where the 
semantic is hinted based on examples).

Ciao
Hannes

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> In case you haven't seen this:
>
> Title        : A Uniform Resource Identifier for Geographic Locations 
> ('geo' URI)
> Author(s)    : A. Mayrhofer, C. Spanring
> Filename    : draft-mayrhofer-geo-uri-00.txt
> Pages        : 13
> Date        : 2007-2-23
>
> It mentions SIP as an application. This is not an endorsement or 
> critique of the proposal, just FYI.
>
> Henning
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Geopriv mailing list
> Geopriv@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv

_______________________________________________
Geopriv mailing list
Geopriv@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv