Re: [Geopriv] review of draft-google-self-published-geofeeds-02
Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 14 November 2013 08:59 UTC
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F7E11E8113 for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:59:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.272, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NdG8RwX148QX for <geopriv@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:59:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 509C311E80FB for <geopriv@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:59:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 0CE16A1; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:59:16 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018989A; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:59:15 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:59:15 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jason Fesler <jfesler@gigo.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADCiYHC7bUmD6xfH-OEtPpmfPM+fWs8+cM0JUbLTZaO62UNT=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311140957010.5805@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311140623050.26054@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CADCiYHC7bUmD6xfH-OEtPpmfPM+fWs8+cM0JUbLTZaO62UNT=Q@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "geopriv@ietf.org" <geopriv@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Geopriv] review of draft-google-self-published-geofeeds-02
X-BeenThere: geopriv@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Geographic Location/Privacy <geopriv.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/geopriv>
List-Post: <mailto:geopriv@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/geopriv>, <mailto:geopriv-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:59:22 -0000
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Jason Fesler wrote: > I understand your intent, or at least I think I do. Perhaps where I fail is > understanding the expected behavior for content operators when there are > multiple conflicting entries; your OR case. It's not conflicting. If a certain IP block is for users in three different US states, then you get three entries, one per state. What you do with this information is up to you. It might not help you enough to do targeted information enough, but now at lesat you know that the user is not in a completely different part of the country/world. > As a content operator, practically speaking, I could still only choose > one location to show users targeted content. Showing users one of N > locations randomly would be a disservice. Showing the first always, > would also be a disservice to many users. I would probably resort to > not using the service provider supplied geo info at all where there are > conflicts. Would you rather not have this inforamation at all? That's what we're talking about.... -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
- [Geopriv] review of draft-google-self-published-g… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [Geopriv] review of draft-google-self-publish… Jason Fesler
- Re: [Geopriv] review of draft-google-self-publish… Mikael Abrahamsson