Re: [GROW] WG Adoption Call for: draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores

[Christopher Morrow <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, t.petch <[e-mail]> wrote:
> Chris
>
> Are you able to declare a consensus on this?  I believe that we are now past
> "12/01/2011 (dec 01 for you not-us-folks)"
>

we are past that date... by a bit :( calendar failure. everyone seems
to have supported it, no disenting issues and even some people
claiming fix actions, w00t!

so this seems as though it's a WG doc now. I'll ask the author(s) to
spin a new copy of the current draft (feel free to fix up some things
about the as112 notes in the call) as a WG doc something like:
  draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

seems right?

-chris
(thanks for the nudge tom!)

> Tom Petch
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Christopher Morrow" <[e-mail]>
> To: <[e-mail]>; <[e-mail]>;
> <[e-mail]>
> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:30 AM
>
>
>> Folks,
>> As mentioned in the WG meeting today, please take the time to
>> read/review/think-about the subject draft:
>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-07>
>>
>> Anthony et-al have done some good work documenting some practices for
>> operators, if the work seems to be relevant for this group, let's hear
>> that and we'll adopt the document. If, on the other hand, we believe
>> this belongs elsewhere, let's provide a pointer set to the authors.
>>
>> Call for this ends: 12/01/2011 (dec 01 for you not-us-folks)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Chris
>> (co-chair)
>>
>>
>