Re: [GROW] WG Adoption Call for: draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores

All,

Thanks for the review and support. I will update the draft over the next 
few days. I assume I will just upload it in the same manner as I have 
previously.

Regards
Tony K

On 21/12/11 5:09 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, t.petch<ietfc@btconnect.com>  wrote:
>> Chris
>>
>> Are you able to declare a consensus on this?  I believe that we are now past
>> "12/01/2011 (dec 01 for you not-us-folks)"
>>
> we are past that date... by a bit :( calendar failure. everyone seems
> to have supported it, no disenting issues and even some people
> claiming fix actions, w00t!
>
> so this seems as though it's a WG doc now. I'll ask the author(s) to
> spin a new copy of the current draft (feel free to fix up some things
> about the as112 notes in the call) as a WG doc something like:
>    draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores
>
> seems right?
>
> -chris
> (thanks for the nudge tom!)
>
>> Tom Petch
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Christopher Morrow"<christopher.morrow@gmail.com>
>> To:<grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org>;<grow@ietf.org>;
>> <tkirkham@anthony-kirkham.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2011 8:30 AM
>>
>>
>>> Folks,
>>> As mentioned in the WG meeting today, please take the time to
>>> read/review/think-about the subject draft:
>>> <http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores-07>
>>>
>>> Anthony et-al have done some good work documenting some practices for
>>> operators, if the work seems to be relevant for this group, let's hear
>>> that and we'll adopt the document. If, on the other hand, we believe
>>> this belongs elsewhere, let's provide a pointer set to the authors.
>>>
>>> Call for this ends: 12/01/2011 (dec 01 for you not-us-folks)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Chris
>>> (co-chair)
>>>
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow
>
>

-- 