IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] draft-iops-grow-bgp-session-culling-00

Job Snijders <job@instituut.net> Tue, 14 March 2017 15:49 UTC

Return-Path: <job@instituut.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6306A1296D3 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:49:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4xVFzUAV7wth for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com (mail-wr0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55DC1296CF for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id u48so126993903wrc.0 for <grow@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:49:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=instituut-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fivX/k0aCS95aWF8eZw93m1bChCD+m8KLSxeD+PWLQ8=; b=D8Jvo3vO0VKqwqu1sGTk2Ut8/rHodZDRW5U9lWk5H4pNrWAvxxN4D1DgCjqlHNSeHK /UtNTIrjBTWVelcdMNeTKkrA1tPmqYB4n1eNaZUZHAWtCyf49jw2yheBKvXPJ76xQfqH pqO4Wl1WttVX8oxMNJ2q31DCj6D27XtSI9TT4iq8itj5fetbyIjvNoC0ZbLnBoPsQKTY b5dZspeuH6Dcn/kjLidE9YbYG8xqnOYxflYWIrW61MLQ9KCnDqA7ix1sf2ibTb28ak6m PDoz7rqjrcHdHYMjUQTt3tTt3u/SJF0Nf1Jwy5YPo88WB2E5zUdoskwVGNZMvSyCIUPo /54w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=fivX/k0aCS95aWF8eZw93m1bChCD+m8KLSxeD+PWLQ8=; b=kF3Q2/EJycBiktUcB+JtdLG/mFHxcH+HsKvLo7T5eUU7ENQ7xan8vLTmnBT9OZChag LiG2EKxc5X1KMM6+Css6Ty9ZgbD5Yf0v37Hx8kyXfzkEpgpND7QgpSEIi/cDfA9FvAs1 oakrvIiplaT6eVMiAOn5M0AsJgROmX+4U2KpumwZlgSM1849bR+hyL4yDpiSuIaggDAg OBo/p/FMY3IgjPK3/Xk8qLujshObfkkXPCGvxQXh1T/su4H4jh4nTXqSUg7BzuPik9t+ aul5I0wIeGSFzJXz+qrjYwrLlB/sVhfLyLbj50dKPWS6rkqRbrAjAgpI5QWiwTA6UZlM xTeQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lqW/TFG4FQpvDE2p8/b+LjndnScZDFcv+Wsszja2ABzyaY51iFhKe3aXSNgvTl2w==
X-Received: by 10.223.163.206 with SMTP id m14mr37770206wrb.34.1489506554951; Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([2001:67c:208c:10:195a:2373:c926:335d]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d6sm15986408wmd.6.2017.03.14.08.49.10 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Mar 2017 08:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 16:49:10 +0100
From: Job Snijders <job@instituut.net>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Cc: bruno.decraene@orange.com, "grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>
Message-ID: <20170314154910.6aprmeelk3essdi3@Vurt.local>
References: <20170312221655.pl47y6qjcqm2wiei@Vurt.local> <0c71f1c9-a1dd-22bf-ec93-444b023efcf1@gmail.com> <20170313161910.GA27138@shrubbery.net> <26854_1489501737_58C7FE29_26854_1752_55_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31C69189@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170314145905.aq3yfynuewankiji@Vurt.local> <10435_1489504054_58C80736_10435_2328_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A31C6A455@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup> <20170314154106.GO2367@Space.Net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170314154106.GO2367@Space.Net>
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/EdwCGb2o9_vJ7w1Ea9WHeX6QvaA>
Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-iops-grow-bgp-session-culling-00
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2017 15:49:18 -0000

On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 04:41:06PM +0100, Gert Doering wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 03:07:32PM +0000, bruno.decraene@orange.com wrote:
> > On a side note, I'd be interesting to know why reducing the impact
> > of the maintenance using gshut is not considered as worth it, while
> > it is for culling. Especially since the benefit of the latter is
> > 90 second (and configurable)  while the former is minutes (and not
> > configurable).
> 
> How's the IXP operator going to introduce a gshut message into a BGP
> session between IXP customer A and IXP customer B?

an IXP can't, and I am not under the impression that Bruno was
suggestion to do so. I took his comments as applicable to section 2.1

this is why the proposed draft contains two angles: one for IXPs and one
for ISPs, each with their different nuances.

Kind regards,

Job

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email