Re: [GROW] [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-route-server-rpki-light-00.txt

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Sat, 14 January 2017 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCFDF1299C1; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:56:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U5s55Km0gR8p; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:56:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D916C1294CD; Sat, 14 Jan 2017 02:56:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Envelope-To: grow@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v0EAuGNP017663 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:56:16 GMT (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host 089-101-070074.ntlworld.ie [89.101.70.74] (may be forged) claimed to be crumpet.local
Message-ID: <587A03CF.3010001@foobar.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:56:15 +0000
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
User-Agent: Postbox 5.0.9 (Macintosh/20161202)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Matthias Waehlisch <m.waehlisch@fu-berlin.de>
References: <148433210469.9788.12815016683609966013.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170113184009.GC1055@Vurt.local> <7C35D47D-6605-4D6D-A97E-BD7139F36DBA@gmail.com> <7f08f967-247e-4060-b643-52bc45d8ab29@Spark> <1E278B10-A5BF-40BE-95C4-7A9B6AF6C817@gmail.com> <c55845cc-ca06-45c8-9b2e-075421d0447c@Spark> <58795A0B.6000009@foobar.org> <alpine.WNT.2.00.1701141045460.14048@mw-PC>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1701141045460.14048@mw-PC>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.2.3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/K3FMWuMHUxDwbfW7SDsUsmfvw7I>
Cc: sidrops@ietf.org, GMO Crops <grow@ietf.org>, job@ntt.net
Subject: Re: [GROW] [Sidrops] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-route-server-rpki-light-00.txt
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2017 10:56:24 -0000

Matthias Waehlisch wrote:
>   I think there are two cases: (1) RS client peers only with route 
> server, (2) RS client peers additionally with other BGP speakers that 
> don't peer with the RS.
> 
>   In case (1) (and assuming that the RS selects the best path on behalf 
> of the client), the IXP provisioning system needs to provide all knobs 
> to implement potential policies -- as you mentioned below. Should be s 
> side note.
> 
>   In case (2), route-server-rpki-light would be still helpful.

Case (1) is not an ietf problem.

Case (2) is already documented in
draft-ietf-sidr-origin-validation-signaling, which proposes a generic
BGP signaling mechanism, i.e. nothing particularly to do with route
servers.  In fact, if the -sidr- draft progresses, it should probably be
mentioned somewhere that the proposed mechanism is likely to cause
unexpected behaviour on route servers unless add-path tx is enabled on
the route server.

Nick