Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores-01.txt
t.petch <ietfc@btconnect.com> Fri, 04 May 2012 08:35 UTC
Return-Path: <ietfc@btconnect.com>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A84C21F870A for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 01:35:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sqBiaW1Sk0Rr for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 May 2012 01:35:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe001.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB72F21F8709 for <grow@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 May 2012 01:35:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail58-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.244) by VA3EHSOBE004.bigfish.com (10.7.40.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:35:25 +0000
Received: from mail58-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail58-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1B03E0099; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:35:25 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.55.224.141; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:DB3PRD0702HT008.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -35
X-BigFish: PS-35(zzbb2dI9371I936eK542M1432N98dKzz1202hzz1033IL8275bh8275dhz2dh2a8h5a9h668h839hd24h304l)
Received: from mail58-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail58-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1336120523273820_29377; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:35:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.249]) by mail58-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3121CC01DC; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:35:23 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from DB3PRD0702HT008.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.55.224.141) by VA3EHSMHS025.bigfish.com (10.7.99.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:35:22 +0000
Received: from SN2PRD0710HT005.namprd07.prod.outlook.com (157.56.234.149) by pod51017.outlook.com (10.3.4.173) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.15.74.2; Fri, 4 May 2012 08:35:23 +0000
Message-ID: <009c01cd29c8$306a8e20$4001a8c0@gateway.2wire.net>
From: "t.petch" <ietfc@btconnect.com>
To: tkirkham@anthony-kirkham.com
References: <20120410064953.27574.88075.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com><4F8F9F9A.8010609@anthony-kirkham.com> <4F9480AE.9030504@inex.ie> <4F9755A3.3090004@anthony-kirkham.com>
Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 09:33:12 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
X-Originating-IP: [157.56.234.149]
X-OriginatorOrg: btconnect.com
Cc: grow@ietf.org, grow-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores-01.txt
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 May 2012 08:35:38 -0000
---- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Kirkham" <tkirkham@anthony-kirkham.com> To: "Nick Hilliard" <nick@inex.ie> Cc: <grow@ietf.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2012 3:38 AM > Thanks Nick, I have incorporated all that feedback. I re-read it and > fixed a few other instances of poor capitalisation. If there are any > other nits, please let me know. > > The only other issue I can see is an erroneous index which gets created > by the XML conversion tool. If anyone has any thoughts on how to change > or remove it, I'd appreciate the advice. Tony The index is generated because you have an <iref ... /> XML element in your source. Perhaps <xref... or <eref... was meant (see http://xml.resource.org/authoring/draft-mrose-writing-rfcs.html for more information). That is the easy part. Getting the I-D to progress, now that is a real challenge, as the recent posts of Ron Bonica to the GROW list may suggest. The next step, assuming you see no scope for improvement (and I would leave the <iref... for the time being), is to ask the Chairs to initiate a Last Call. There is an e-mail address for the chairs of a WG, which persists as and when the individuals appointed to the office change, and I have added that to this reply. Tom Petch > > Tony K > > > > On 23/04/12 8:05 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 19/04/2012 06:16, Anthony Kirkham wrote: > >> All, > >> > >> I'm very keen to know if we can progress this draft to WGLC? Comments please? > > I like the draft and would like to see it moved to WGLC. No major > > comments, but a couple of nits: > > > > - weil-shared-transition-space-request is now rfc6598 > > - the last paragraph in section 5 is sloppily worded. > > - section 11, reword "to using private addressing, Such" to be "to using > > private addressing; such" > > - there are a couple of other incorrect capitalisations and instances of > > incorrectly used punctuation marks. > > > > Nick > > > >> Tony K > >> > >> > >> On 10/04/12 4:49 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > >>> directories. This draft is a work item of the Global Routing Operations > >>> Working Group of the IETF. > >>> > >>> Title : Issues with Private IP Addressing in the Internet > >>> Author(s) : Anthony Kirkham > >>> Filename : draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores-01.txt > >>> Pages : 15 > >>> Date : 2012-04-09 > >>> > >>> The purpose of this document is to provide a discussion of the > >>> potential problems of using private, RFC1918, or non-globally- > >>> routable addressing within the core of an SP network. The discussion > >>> focuses on link addresses and to a small extent loopback addresses. > >>> While many of the issues are well recognised within the ISP > >>> community, there appears to be no document that collectively > >>> describes the issues. > >>> > >>> > >>> A URL for this Internet-Draft is: > >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores-01.txt > >>> > >>>
- [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-… internet-drafts
- Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip… Anthony Kirkham
- Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip… Anthony Kirkham
- Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip… t.petch
- Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip… Christopher Morrow