IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for Adoption draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv (start 30/Mar/2023 end 21/Apr/2023)

Luuk Hendriks <luuk@nlnetlabs.nl> Mon, 03 April 2023 07:37 UTC

Return-Path: <luuk@nlnetlabs.nl>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC2AC1516E1 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.797
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.797 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=nlnetlabs.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GecjolFzln3L for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from outbound.soverin.net (outbound.soverin.net [IPv6:2a10:de80:1:4091:b9e9:2214:0:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190F4C15153F for <grow@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 00:37:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (c04smtp-lb01.int.sover.in [10.10.4.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by outbound.soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PqjQg6yJGz5G; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 07:37:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtp.soverin.net (smtp.soverin.net [10.10.4.99]) by soverin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4PqjQg3wZkzL5; Mon, 3 Apr 2023 07:37:15 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nlnetlabs.nl; s=soverin; t=1680507435; bh=vuIqw+WDPR2ww0+2JKlfuZr/Q3N8mu+RyC9vG/VGk/w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=tB9MHiIwYjTw45qqfFhd+4DERZGe5jDaCf50TLdBN5qXcaLqUJfnG0aEJKYUzE9nf 8UWPX1kQ2NTiWIlc194tOsRibo87TUVxybUhqYYR2t6r+Z+Tb1aewerbIhEdZfL2jK XQeGhR7OJSsMbIMghAFTvuHGwbfBHjOvwFi2s0WZGmpyAdIZSPhuDvosSvWMJwm+oz vELqpUMBou1qZXn59Lq96CHAy14mbLs3Hw2b2tp4/5AUtmF1dccFdP7y8ZiymgUPgQ JoIc9bqufWFAMB4qwbX5WnXt1JrNa+A6b15+H2hfYY7QjBjQT33dF+YCH3cpqfxjEA pcTGy4MwiaFng==
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 09:37:15 +0200
X-Soverin-Authenticated: true
From: Luuk Hendriks <luuk@nlnetlabs.nl>
To: Job Snijders <job=40fastly.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: grow@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20230403073715.GA1384391@corley.shackle.nl>
References: <ZCURlJ4xBXGyuNdf@feather.sobornost.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZCURlJ4xBXGyuNdf@feather.sobornost.net>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/grow/RKtNfmUN7Wv4zha_NSsXTuUZ6BY>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Working Group Call for Adoption draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv (start 30/Mar/2023 end 21/Apr/2023)
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2023 07:37:24 -0000

Hi all,

I support adoption, this concept would offer very useful insights in
both troubleshooting and general analysis of router behaviours.


Best,
 luuk


On Thu 30 Mar 2023, 04:35, Job Snijders wrote:
> Dear GROW,
> 
> The authors of draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv asked whether GROW
> working group could consider adoption of the internet-draft.
> 
> This message is a request to the group for feedback on whether this
> internet-draft should be adopted.
> 
> Title: BMP Extension for Path Status TLV
> Abstract: 
>   The BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) provides an interface for obtaining
>   BGP Path information. BGP Path Information is conveyed within BMP Route
>   Monitoring (RM) messages. This document proposes an extension to BMP to
>   convey the status of a path after being processed by the BGP process.
>   This extension makes use of the TLV mechanims described in
>   draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv and draft-ietf-grow-bmp-tlv-ebit.
> 
> The Internet-Draft can be found here:
> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-cppy-grow-bmp-path-marking-tlv-12.html
> 
> Please share with the mailing list if you are think this work should be
> adopted by GROW, willing to review and/or otherwise contribute to this
> draft!
> 
> WG Adoption call ends April 21th, 2023.
> 
> Kind regards,
> 
> Job / Chris
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GROW mailing list
> GROW@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email