Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

["Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Chris,

That one will do.


Yunan

From: Christopher Morrow
To: Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW)<[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: grow<[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>;grow-chairs<[e-mail]>" >;grow-ads<<mailto:[e-mail]>>[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103
Time: 2018-11-05 09:10:05

Yunan, was this set of slides what you wanted to present for today?
Did you have alternate slides?

On Mon, Nov 5, 2018 at 1:11 AM Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Dear Grow members,

We have attached the slides to better illustrate our draft: “draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection-00”. We basically explained the ideas of 1. The conventional route leak PROTECTION methods; 2. the intra-AS route leak PROTECTION method -- using BGP open policy method proposed by “draft-ietf-idr-bgp-open-policy-03”, and 3. our intra-AS route leak DETECTION method.

We believe that our method provides a route leak self-checking method for a single ISP, which is complementary to any existing route leak protection methods as a way of validation.

Although we don’t have a slot for discussion tomorrow at the meeting, we do hope to solicit more comments.


Thanks.

Yunan


From: GROW [mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>] On Behalf Of Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW)
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 9:28 AM
To: Christopher Morrow <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

Hi Chris,

Sure! We’d also like to solicit some comments on our draft.

Hi, Grow folks,

This draft proposes a method for detecting BGP route leaks using BMP. We mainly identified the requirements and concerns for the route leak detection, such as implementation dependency on other ISPs, detection accuracy and so on. We feel that BMP might be a good choice for the detection information collection with minor extension work while meeting these requirements.

Please, feel free to comment on either the motivation or solution.

https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection-00.txt

Yunan

From: Christopher Morrow [mailto:[e-mail]]
Sent: 2018年10月24日 9:46
To: Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

Can we get some discussion on-list prior please?

On Tue, Oct 23, 2018 at 9:41 PM Guyunan (Yunan Gu, IP Technology Research Dept. NW) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Hi Chris,

I’d like to request a 15 min discussion for “draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection-00”

Thanks.

Yunan



A new version of I-D, draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection-00.txt

has been successfully submitted by Shunwan Zhuang and posted to the IETF repository.



Name:             draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection

Revision:         00

Title:                BMP for BGP Route Leak Detection

Document date:         2018-10-22

Group:            Individual Submission

Pages:             8

URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection-00.txt

Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection/

Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection-00

Htmlized:       https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-gu-grow-bmp-route-leak-detection





Abstract:

   According to RFC7908 [RFC7908], Route leaks refer to case that the

   delivery range of route advertisements is beyond the expected range.

   For many current security protection solutions, the ISPs (Internet

   Service Providers) are focusing on finding ways to detect the

   happening of route leaks.  However, the real-time route leak

   detection if any occurs is important as well.  This document extends

   the BGP Monitoring Protocol (BMP) [RFC7854] to provide a routing

   security scheme suitable for ISPs to detect BGP route leaks within

   their own networks.


From: GROW [mailto:[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>] On Behalf Of Christopher Morrow
Sent: 2018年10月24日 4:41
To: [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>; [e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>
Subject: Re: [GROW] Agenda Slot Requests - IETF 103

Howdy Grow Folks... topics for discussion?

On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 12:16 PM Christopher Morrow <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Howdy GrowFolks:

Please send along agenda requests as time permits... We are planning to meet in Bangkok, unless no one can find agenda topics? :)

-chris