Re: [GROW] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Alvaro Retana <[e-mail]>]

On April 5, 2021 at 9:16:24 PM, Tim Evens wrote:

Tim:

Hi!  How are you?


> I'm new to the process. When is the discussion scheduled? I believe there is
> a telechat on 4/8 at 7am PDT. Is this when you want to discuss this? I have
> not seen an invite with a link for the conference/meeting.

The DISCUSS position is mostly used to signal that a significant issue
has been identified -- something that we want to resolve before the
document is approved.  But it is not an invitation to an actual
live/f2f discussion -- we should be able to handle the points on
e-mail.

The IESG does have a Telechat scheduled for this Thursday, in which we
focus on going through all the documents currently in IESG Evaluation.
Authors are usually not present in the call and any live discussion is
normally handled by the AD.  In general, any observers (including
authors) don't participate in the discussion.  You are welcome to dial
in [1] if you want to -- but as I mentioned above, we should be able
to resolve the issues on e-mail.

Also, take a look at this:
https://www.ietf.org/blog/handling-iesg-ballot-positions/


[1] ⁨https://ietf.webex.com/ietf/j.php?MTID=m38beb3706c7e5a24dd749a50d7e87dfd ⁩



> I have lc, rtgdir, and secdir updates in revision 11 that have not been
> submitted yet (https://github.com/TimEvens/draft-ietf-grow-bmp-loc-rib). The
> below would require some minor updates. I can add those to the pending
> updates to revision 11. All the updates are minor/clarifications so far.
> AFAIK, the issue with IANA peer flags and title update of "Initiation … TLVs"
> have been resolved.
>
> I'll send a respond to the below nits and peer flag question tomorrow, PDT
> time.


Thanks!

Alvaro.