IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-simple-leak-attack-bgpsec-no-help-03.txt

Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> Sat, 23 November 2013 02:41 UTC

Return-Path: <gih@apnic.net>
X-Original-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: grow@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785C61AC404 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:41:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.316
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.316 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.525, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIM_INVALID=0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1SiRSIIRK8k9 for <grow@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:41:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ia-mailgw.apnic.net (ia-mailgw.apnic.net [IPv6:2001:dd8:a:3::243]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3EAE71A1F72 for <grow@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 18:41:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=apnic.net; s=c3po; h=received:received:received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to: date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer: return-path; bh=Wuz18oFRnIO+HRULwQ3c0wdhY98kwjLFe3Gyf9Brdbk=; b=6MxAXJsYXYvC0zAplWU8lOZZP6aQ/oZM+nKlIbbZ8PFJiYEr9PM31yS9ZxeChKR6lqR8DB16S2maf GtQTetdLEDceNHAB1IwhvkTZnT/+sIHHxcFW3FKGuKtOlgLHXxFXF7o8KhsxJDp1FGgDI7BjT87PIk QQfwzBpr3AvrsWUM=
Received: from NXMDA1.org.apnic.net (unknown [203.119.93.247]) by ia-mailgw.apnic.net (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTP; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:41:47 +1000 (EST)
Received: from IAMDA2.org.apnic.net (2001:dd8:a:852::21) by NXMDA1.org.apnic.net (2001:dd8:9:802:90fc:97c2:1a5f:d67d) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.12; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:41:47 +1000
Received: from [192.168.1.9] (203.119.101.249) by IAMDA2.org.apnic.net (203.119.111.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.438.0; Sat, 23 Nov 2013 12:41:46 +1000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
From: Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net>
In-Reply-To: <28283549-453B-4864-B38B-1F9CF0E43973@apnic.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 13:41:47 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <A7AAB365-0DBA-4294-890D-A28EAB97BF39@apnic.net>
References: <20131118230146.22016.28407.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <77143901-5DA3-4937-8162-509B62A61594@apnic.net> <CAL9jLabPjvXaAUaSEyQXdFvSDPZ_bJX4rjGxOGd0BqYhQcQYdg@mail.gmail.com> <FDFB46E9-ECD0-4CFF-A846-2E6FE9F8C9D7@apnic.net> <CAL9jLaaFszKUR0oZe-3gxR8JeFyTAjoe1BmD2ixXnjhvU7Mv5A@mail.gmail.com> <3EEF9354-766C-4687-8DD4-55759B9826CB@apnic.net> <2F3EBB88EC3A454AAB08915FBF0B8C7E02EF1AA2@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> <7233FDA7-9E25-4946-A06C-C23432314FC3@apnic.net> <2F3EBB88EC3A454AAB08915FBF0B8C7E02EF1D5A@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> <28283549-453B-4864-B38B-1F9CF0E43973@apnic.net>
To: Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: "grow@ietf.org grow@ietf.org" <grow@ietf.org>, "sidr wg list (sidr@ietf.org)" <sidr@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-simple-leak-attack-bgpsec-no-help-03.txt
X-BeenThere: grow@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Grow Working Group Mailing List <grow.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/grow/>
List-Post: <mailto:grow@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow>, <mailto:grow-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Nov 2013 02:41:58 -0000

On 23 Nov 2013, at 1:17 pm, Geoff Huston <gih@apnic.net> wrote:

> 
> On 23 Nov 2013, at 10:40 am, Jakob Heitz <jakob.heitz@ericsson.com> wrote:
> 
>> I think you mean "paths with valleys are all instances of unintended routing".
>> 
> 
> sorry, yes, that is what I meant to say! :-)

and lest this be misunderstood, then I said: but "as I recall there is a line of argument
that says that some paths that contain valleys are intentional."

  Geoff

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email