IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal

"Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com> Tue, 08 June 2010 20:05 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
X-Original-To: hasmat@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hasmat@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D81A3A6908 for <hasmat@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:05:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.169
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.169 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.430, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2oG7qgJa00D7 for <hasmat@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:05:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (demumfd001.nsn-inter.net [93.183.12.32]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDFD3A67C2 for <hasmat@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:05:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net ([10.150.129.55]) by demumfd001.nsn-inter.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o58K5hSN028615 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:05:43 +0200
Received: from demuexc024.nsn-intra.net (demuexc024.nsn-intra.net [10.159.32.11]) by demuprx016.emea.nsn-intra.net (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o58K5hdE010649; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:05:43 +0200
Received: from FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net ([10.159.0.23]) by demuexc024.nsn-intra.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:05:42 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 23:05:58 +0300
Message-ID: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4502AF72C3@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net>
In-Reply-To: <4C0EA1A5.8050107@stpeter.im>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal
Thread-Index: AcsHRW3VOCHHc50JQUuMW/jKU6HNjwAAFpnA
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4502AF72B4@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net><004c01cb0745$05d90e40$118b2ac0$@net> <4C0EA1A5.8050107@stpeter.im>
From: "Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)" <hannes.tschofenig@nsn.com>
To: ext Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, hasmat@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jun 2010 20:05:42.0289 (UTC) FILETIME=[F90FC810:01CB0745]
Subject: Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal
X-BeenThere: hasmat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <hasmat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hasmat>, <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hasmat>
List-Post: <mailto:hasmat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hasmat>, <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:05:45 -0000

I agree with Peter and Thomas.  
Stating this more explicitly in the charter sounds good to me.

>-----Original Message-----
>From: hasmat-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:hasmat-bounces@ietf.org] 
>On Behalf Of ext Peter Saint-Andre
>Sent: 08 June, 2010 23:02
>To: hasmat@ietf.org
>Subject: Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal
>
>On 6/8/10 1:58 PM, Thomas Hardjono wrote:
>
>> What is out of scope for the HASMAT WG? (ie. should anything 
>be called 
>> out by the Charter as being out of scope, such as authentication and 
>> transport topics).
>
>At a minimum:
>
>1. Replacements for BASIC and DIGEST authentication.
>
>2. New transports (SCTP and the like).
>
>Or that's my understanding. Hannes and Jeff and others might 
>be able to provide further insights.
>
>Peter
>
>--
>Peter Saint-Andre
>https://stpeter.im/
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email