Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal
Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Tue, 08 June 2010 20:01 UTC
Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: hasmat@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hasmat@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97963A67FD for <hasmat@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:01:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.149
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.149 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.450, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1zi+YAw3YP0Q for <hasmat@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECB83A67C2 for <hasmat@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 13:01:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-121.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-121.cisco.com [64.101.72.121]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6B40840CFD for <hasmat@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 14:01:42 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4C0EA1A5.8050107@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 14:01:41 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hasmat@ietf.org
References: <3D3C75174CB95F42AD6BCC56E5555B4502AF72B4@FIESEXC015.nsn-intra.net> <004c01cb0745$05d90e40$118b2ac0$@net>
In-Reply-To: <004c01cb0745$05d90e40$118b2ac0$@net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms090606050409030209030108"
Subject: Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal
X-BeenThere: hasmat@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <hasmat.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hasmat>, <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hasmat>
List-Post: <mailto:hasmat@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hasmat>, <mailto:hasmat-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 20:01:42 -0000
On 6/8/10 1:58 PM, Thomas Hardjono wrote: > What is out of scope for the HASMAT WG? (ie. should anything be called out > by the Charter as being out of scope, such as authentication and transport > topics). At a minimum: 1. Replacements for BASIC and DIGEST authentication. 2. New transports (SCTP and the like). Or that's my understanding. Hannes and Jeff and others might be able to provide further insights. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
- [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal Thomas Hardjono
- Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
- Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal =JeffH
- Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal =JeffH
- Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal Adam Barth
- Re: [HASMAT] HASMAT Charter Proposal =JeffH