Re: [Hipsec] Segmentation within HIP

Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com> Tue, 29 March 2016 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rgm@htt-consult.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4830112D84E for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZyRLEb_7gV2 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [50.253.254.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6528A12D857 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 07:14:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E0796226B; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:14:28 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at htt-consult.com
Received: from z9m9z.htt-consult.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (z9m9z.htt-consult.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id njFuD8KnsRCX; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:14:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lx120e.htt-consult.com (181.sub-70-208-79.myvzw.com [70.208.79.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by z9m9z.htt-consult.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69D696225D; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:14:21 -0400 (EDT)
To: Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>, dfawcus+lists-hipsec@employees.org, hipsec@ietf.org
References: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1603251816260.6230@hymn04.u.washington.edu> <56F9D086.1000105@htt-consult.com> <20160329065028.GB12048@cowbell.employees.org>
From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm@htt-consult.com>
Message-ID: <56FA8DBA.5030205@htt-consult.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 10:14:18 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20160329065028.GB12048@cowbell.employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/3otCHMLsxMxc7UdSuleszgYubAM>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Segmentation within HIP
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:14:37 -0000

That is why I recommended you look at what Sue and I are developing for 
a session layer service on top of any transport that would provide 
this.  And of course it is always worthwhile to look at anything Joe 
Touch worked on....

On 03/29/2016 02:50 AM, Derek Fawcus wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 08:47:02PM -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>> For starters i would look at the UDP NAT tunneling mechinism to provide it.
> Well,  UDP doesn't have any native segmentation / reassembly either;
> so while it would help in getting across a NAT,  it'd not do anything
> for fragments.
>
> I could see someone digging out the scheme which was proposed a while
> ago for UDP segmentation,  and casting it to fit within
> draft-touch-tsvwg-udp-options-02.txt.
>
> DF
>