Re: [Hipsec] WGLC comments
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Fri, 12 June 2015 13:07 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B61B1A9060 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 06:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wiAntiub5XBv for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 06:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 337401A9106 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 06:07:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794d6d000004501-4f-557ad990007f
Received: from ESESSHC003.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 4B.35.17665.099DA755; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:07:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.175] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Fri, 12 Jun 2015 15:07:27 +0200
Message-ID: <557AD98F.2060106@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 16:07:27 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>, Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1506102117290.1751@hymn01.u.washington.edu> <CAE_dhjssyAuUPYLuRP93V+LrujyKyvqA1zspqZZaZjxnmQdChw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhjssyAuUPYLuRP93V+LrujyKyvqA1zspqZZaZjxnmQdChw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvre6Em1WhBjf+KVlMXTSZ2eLL0WnM FjPPH2RzYPbYOesuu8eSJT+ZPFquxwQwR3HZpKTmZJalFunbJXBlnFr0ibngKUvF+4+PGRsY HzN3MXJySAiYSFxc94AFwhaTuHBvPVsXIxeHkMBRRon7O68zQzhrGSVu758P1sEroC2xfvZE VhCbRUBV4tKjG2A2m4CFxJZb98EmiQpESUz8eogFol5Q4uTMJ2C2iEC4xL67X8HmMAtISizf 9IsNxBYWkJK4Pa8balkvo8TfWdvBijgFAiXO3j7G2MXIAdSgKbF+lz5Er7zE9rdzwEqEgO5Z /qyFZQKj4Cwk62YhdMxC0rGAkXkVo2hxanFxbrqRsV5qUWZycXF+nl5easkmRmAAH9zyW3cH 4+rXjocYBTgYlXh4FWyrQoVYE8uKK3MPMUpzsCiJ887YnBcqJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8 iJGJg1OqgZHZ2raH071+ssfmvx1V06ziAubIc25n2jFlo1Q3152ZnWF30iMbfOekiZUnWVxf wXchM/VpX2nD+twb1lXawcezrDjWCSQt6mrW1fsnGsgiqZERLbu1vzFzKS+PucrGDSnyVa9b bq79MPlOnlKbvKnnhpxzXpadf3sX7vSUftxh98SlvV1JiaU4I9FQi7moOBEABanzXkECAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/52fHDD-610m-8_OvnFdcMqsgkBg>
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC comments
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 13:07:33 -0000
Thanks for revising the drafts, Julien. I will prepare the PROTO writeups in order to start the "publication request" process for this batch. Cheers, Gonzalo On 11/06/2015 5:25 PM, Julien Laganier wrote: > Thank you for the quick follow-up, Tom! > > Gonzalo, I believe all WGLC comments have been addresses at this point. > > --julien > > On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 9:17 PM, Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu> wrote: >> Hi Julien, I read through all of your responses to my comments on 5203-bis, 5204-bis, and 5205-bis, and agree with your handling of them. >> >> Thanks, >> Tom >>
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC comments Tom Henderson
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC comments Julien Laganier
- Re: [Hipsec] WGLC comments Gonzalo Camarillo