Re: [Hipsec] Base draft & ESP draft: snapshots

On Tue, 2005-08-16 at 17:05 +0200, Pekka Nikander wrote
> There appears to be a minor problem between 6.13 and 6.14.  6.13 says  
> that CLOSE may be answered with an ICMP, 6.14 that they are dropped.

Actually, there is a whole section "5.4.4  Non-existing HIP Association"
that discusses about responding to CLOSE and NOTIFY messages with an
ICMP if we do not have any state with that peer. In Paris, I think we
agreed that we are not going to respond to an incoming CLOSE with any
message. Should we ignore also incoming NOTIFYs if there is no
association? Is there any reason why we would like to answer to NOTIFYs
in UNASSOCIATED state?

> Need to specify "LSI" briefly in Section 2 as it is used in 6.1

Should we remove all text related to LSIs, and concentrate only on HITs
in this draft? All LSI related stuff would be in
draft-henderson-hip-applications. 

/petri

_______________________________________________
Hipsec mailing list
Hipsec@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec