Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis

Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 02 June 2015 13:00 UTC

Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 633401A00FE for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YXfsSn8yDimh for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:00:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sessmg23.ericsson.net (sessmg23.ericsson.net [193.180.251.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC53F1A00F6 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 06:00:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb2d-f794d6d000004501-e6-556da9035e92
Received: from ESESSHC005.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg23.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 9A.94.17665.309AD655; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:00:51 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [147.214.22.100] (153.88.183.153) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.210.2; Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:00:51 +0200
Message-ID: <556DA903.3070009@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 15:00:51 +0200
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julien Laganier <julien.ietf@gmail.com>
References: <5530E4A8.70300@ericsson.com> <5547FA8B.9000907@tomh.org> <5548CD40.2040709@ericsson.com> <CAE_dhju=+ViW5Ltm=On+RWEV3pLwUrw4b5b_wYfeP-qaMXOO-Q@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAE_dhju=+ViW5Ltm=On+RWEV3pLwUrw4b5b_wYfeP-qaMXOO-Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrFLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrS7zytxQg62frSymLprMbPHl6DRm i8a7f5gcmD12zrrL7rFkyU8mjz3XNAKYo7hsUlJzMstSi/TtErgyDs/MLDgkUvHm00HmBsZj Al2MnBwSAiYSLzfPYIOwxSQu3FsPZHNxCAkcZZTYOG8RO4SzmlHi/oW/YFW8AtoSx/5OAkpw cLAIqEgs3lgCEmYTsJDYcus+C4gtKhAlMfHrIRaIckGJkzOfgNkiQK2nJjWA2cxA9S377jCD jBEWMJOYPTMRJCwksIpRYvMfQxCbUyBQ4mzTC7BNzAKaEut36UN0yktsfzuHGaJcW2L5sxaW CYyCs5Asm4XQMQtJxwJG5lWMosWpxcW56UbGeqlFmcnFxfl5enmpJZsYgYF7cMtv3R2Mq187 HmIU4GBU4uFV4MsNFWJNLCuuzD3EKM3BoiTO69UVEiokkJ5YkpqdmlqQWhRfVJqTWnyIkYmD U6qB0a5ElzUqfEpI1o/yqaL/rhXZODwPU/is+/P2Li6mbKbNRV4mezw88wMuxSsxSOb0e1/+ FvX6lsrHFU3sc6T/TMw5yjiza+PEW1v6F/3/P/OZXu4vFnG7hp/ZeWt9ipgiv0UIyIZVBjPH BDyel3K2SzJp1Q8W1WW7Dwn/+lXhdPPSLXmGB8rrlViKMxINtZiLihMBrF3EAz0CAAA=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/Qc8LxMvB3BSnRdi1b_uQEnLNp-w>
Cc: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] WGLC: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 13:00:59 -0000

Hi Julien,

when do you think you will get around to revising the draft per Tom's
comments? As you know, the plan is to request the publication of the
drafts in the next batch together.

Cheers,

Gonzalo

On 06/05/2015 2:02 AM, Julien Laganier wrote:
> Thanks for the review Tom, we will address your WGLC comments ASAP.
> 
> --julien
> 
> On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 7:01 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo
> <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> wrote:
>> Thanks for this review as well, Tom.
>>
>> Julien, Lars, could you please address Tom's comments in a new revision
>> of the draft?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Gonzalo
>>
>> On 05/05/2015 2:02 AM, Tom Henderson wrote:
>>> On 04/17/2015 03:47 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I would like to start a WGLC on the following draft. This WGLC will end
>>>> on May 4th:
>>>>
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis/
>>>>
>>>> Please, send your comments to this list.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Gonzalo
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Hipsec mailing list
>>>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>>>>
>>>
>>> Here are a few questions/comments on this draft.
>>>
>>> Technical
>>> ---------
>>> Section 4.3.3 (including VIA_RVS) seems to conflict with 4.2.3 (VIA_RVS
>>> parameter definition).  Section 4.3.3 states that VIA_RVS is mandatory
>>> if the I1 arrived via a RVS, but 4.2.3 says that the responder MAY
>>> choose to send it for debugging purposes.
>>>
>>> Another point regarding Section 4.2.3:  it states that the responder may
>>> include "a subset of the IP addresses of its RVSs in some of the
>>> packets."  What use cases are there for including more than a single RVS
>>> address (the one that was used)?   Would more than one RVS ever need to
>>> be traversed between initiator and responder?  I don't think the draft
>>> supports such security relationships, so perhaps it would be best to
>>> explicitly say it is out of scope.
>>>
>>> Editorial
>>> ----------
>>> Section 6 (IANA) needs to be updated to request the new action items of
>>> IANA, not the ones previously asked when 5204 was published.
>>> Accordingly, IANA is not assigning new Parameter Types but instead this
>>> draft should request that IANA update the reference for these three
>>> types from 5204 to this document.  The same holds for the Registration
>>> Type value.
>>>
>>> - Tom
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Hipsec mailing list
>> Hipsec@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec
>