[Hipsec] draft status for RFC5202-bis
Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org> Fri, 18 July 2014 06:56 UTC
Return-Path: <tomh@tomh.org>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80FC1A0A86 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.667
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.667 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YsGHmYOkz52x for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com (gproxy2-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com [69.89.18.3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B15141B2906 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:56:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 31290 invoked by uid 0); 18 Jul 2014 06:56:43 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw4) (10.0.90.85) by gproxy2.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 18 Jul 2014 06:56:43 -0000
Received: from box528.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.128]) by cmgw4 with id Towd1o00D2molgS01owgLj; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:56:42 -0600
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=OcELUHjY c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=K/474su/0lCI2gKrDs9DLw==:117 a=K/474su/0lCI2gKrDs9DLw==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8 a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=ZSdzdHkL1-cA:10 a=vKEh8PXGzQoA:10 a=q7J0aIbBmN8A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=HYWc1YUsAAAA:8 a=IA_2sfgTpx8A:10 a=rREcAdlOb-AA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=_QRqnzaw5JXmlWU4c2MA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=HvMzZPUT1n4A:10 a=SZSsTm5PJI0A:10 a=65i-nI39n1wA:10 a=Ye1-85Zid-wA:10
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tomh.org; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=04GCZh/78QmcFDprstC6kMimwhYYQ+rr5xVz/Ylojb8=; b=cYlEDHsEfprtyPOPSJbqQVGQPjN2bTZk83J+O5nHSo48iNPVvE1fimfNQD22Wp9vclbl/sm8QBnQaVpJ4e5wVWHN1hsn8DCO4H0po2sWf1K62sVG7MZMtQipeIEglPwu;
Received: from [71.231.123.189] (port=59859 helo=[192.168.168.42]) by box528.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from <tomh@tomh.org>) id 1X825u-0005Nq-K8 for hipsec@ietf.org; Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:56:38 -0600
Message-ID: <53C8C523.4090105@tomh.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:56:35 -0700
From: Tom Henderson <tomh@tomh.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {3122:box528.bluehost.com:tomhorg:tomh.org} {sentby:smtp auth 71.231.123.189 authed with tomh@tomh.org}
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/VSvx-KBCsiHi02833qZIWtYmjhM
Subject: [Hipsec] draft status for RFC5202-bis
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 06:56:48 -0000
Regarding RFC5202-bis, the two main issues still alive are: 1) the question of NULL encryption as a MUST to implement (discussed here: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec/current/msg03888.html) and also on the saag list. (issue 43 in the tracker: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/43) 2) cleanup of IANA issues (issue 44 in the tracker: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/44) - Tom
- [Hipsec] draft status for RFC5202-bis Tom Henderson