Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-04.txt

Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu> Tue, 13 October 2015 05:04 UTC

Return-Path: <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FEFE1B3779 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3ldYFSXXpisH for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout26.s.uw.edu (mxout26.s.uw.edu [140.142.234.176]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DECC1B3778 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:04:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (hymn02.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.71]) by mxout26.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t9D50ZGo017987 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:00:36 -0700
Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t9D50Vnc005602 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:00:31 -0700
Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 20280@localhost) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t9D50VAL005599 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:00:31 -0700
X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn02.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:00:31 PDT
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1510122200310.4683@hymn02.u.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2493963, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.10.13.45417
X-PMX-Server: mxout26.s.uw.edu
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_300_399 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, NO_CTA_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_FOUND 0, NO_URI_HTTPS 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __USER_AGENT 0'
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/YmwGn1cW4PrtiAVxXGzUvP_BYrM>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-04.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 05:04:10 -0000


On 10/12/2015 02:42 AM, Miika Komu wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't have a strong opinion, but I guess SPKI should be dropped since 
> the HIP CERT work is going proceed to the standards track.
> 

I feel the same way (no strong opinion, but suggest to drop unless someone strongly argues to keep it).

- Tom