[Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Tue, 16 July 2013 07:25 UTC
Return-Path: <gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE7711E8181 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.935
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.935 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.336, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xEloP6CDA88e for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesbmg20.ericsson.net (sesbmg20.ericsson.net [193.180.251.56]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DEC11E80E2 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:25:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb38-b7f456d000002e83-3c-51e4f5508ce0
Received: from ESESSHC006.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sesbmg20.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 2B.1D.11907.055F4E15; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:25:05 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.72] (153.88.183.20) by smtp.internal.ericsson.com (153.88.183.38) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.328.9; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:25:02 +0200
Message-ID: <51E4F548.8050903@ericsson.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 10:24:56 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: HIP <hipsec@ietf.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFnrCJMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7g1yeBBsvO8FhMXTSZ2YHRY8mS n0wBjFFcNimpOZllqUX6dglcGY8udrIVtLNWvL11la2BsZeli5GTQ0LAROLoxLOsELaYxIV7 69m6GLk4hASOMkocP3afCcJZzSgx+fN5sCpeAW2Jvnm/wbpZBFQl5l/8zA5iswlYSGy5dR8s LioQJdHaO5UZol5Q4uTMJ2BxEQFJiZ67S8FsYaDeZzP+M0JslpTY8qIdbA6zgJ7ElKstjBC2 vMT2t3PA5ggB7V3+rIVlAiP/LCRjZyFpmYWkZQEj8ypGjuLU4qTcdCODTYzAkDq45bfFDsbL f20OMUpzsCiJ827ROxMoJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgVFWqvRTz/1V850zM+f8 uq7zvEPKOn3LvzWrd/E66Np/fKCuq59c3D3hcqHbtN9R6y8uNnKbXfHjWDXD4qdJyydbuISv cv0TtDb6uZL5asWpxbMk5vtHXan/cOvqi0ZDjufvayrfreU6K3598k/vaHNVVa6JitNXH2yc LFIWc/3GJI3unJeRzUZKLMUZiYZazEXFiQCGlf2s9wEAAA==
Subject: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 07:25:12 -0000
Folks, one of the questions we need to answer when requesting the publication of the bis specs is the following: > Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a significant > number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the specification? If you could send me an update on your implementation, or third-party implementations you are aware of, that would be great. In particular, it would be good to know which implementers intend to update their implementations to comply with the Standards Track bis specs (as opposed to implementations that are no being actively maintained any longer). Thanks, Gonzalo
- [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation Henderson, Thomas R