Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation
Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi> Tue, 16 July 2013 08:50 UTC
Return-Path: <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3860F11E8271 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:50:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6OFBI4vyvq4q for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cs.hut.fi (mail.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 791B711E8268 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hutcs.cs.hut.fi [130.233.192.10]) by mail.cs.hut.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA853308392 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:50:11 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <51E50941.4010208@cs.hut.fi>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 11:50:09 +0300
From: Miika Komu <mkomu@cs.hut.fi>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: hipsec@ietf.org
References: <51E4F548.8050903@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <51E4F548.8050903@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/hipsec>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:50:28 -0000
Hi, On 07/16/2013 10:24 AM, Gonzalo Camarillo wrote: > Folks, > > one of the questions we need to answer when requesting the publication > of the bis specs is the following: > >> Are there existing implementations of the protocol? Have a significant >> number of vendors indicated their plan to implement the specification? > > If you could send me an update on your implementation, or third-party > implementations you are aware of, that would be great. In particular, it > would be good to know which implementers intend to update their > implementations to comply with the Standards Track bis specs (as opposed > to implementations that are no being actively maintained any longer). HIP for Linux has already taken steps to update it's implementation. While some things remain to be updated (e.g. DNS proxy support), RWTH Aachen contributed ECDSA code and Xin Gu has implemented ECDH and other HIPv2 extensions. The latter part is still in the merging queue, but will be merged during the summer. During the transition, HIPL is going to support both HIPv1 and HIPv2. Xin Gu's work has been documented here: http://nordsecmob.aalto.fi/en/publications/theses_2012/gu-xin_thesis.pdf His work also included extending HIP as an application-layer library. We mostly use it for loopback regression testing of the implementation. Other references: http://hipl.hiit.fi/ https://launchpad.net/hipl
- [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation Miika Komu
- Re: [Hipsec] Status of HIP implementation Henderson, Thomas R