Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09.txt
Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu> Thu, 23 July 2015 00:23 UTC
Return-Path: <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
X-Original-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08E21B2FE2 for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:23:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SiAchjL7JOsM for <hipsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mxout22.s.uw.edu (mxout22.s.uw.edu [128.95.242.222]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4BF1A8862 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:23:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (hymn02.u.washington.edu [140.142.8.71]) by mxout22.s.uw.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW15.02) with ESMTP id t6N0MQkN014007 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:26 -0700
Received: from hymn02.u.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+UW14.04) with ESMTP id t6N0MNXW028208 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:23 -0700
Received: from localhost (Unknown UID 20280@localhost) by hymn02.u.washington.edu (8.14.4+UW14.03/8.14.4+Submit-local) with ESMTP id t6N0MN5Z028205 for <hipsec@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:23 -0700
X-Auth-Received: from [73.181.150.17] by hymn02.u.washington.edu via HTTP; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:23 PDT
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 17:22:23 -0700
From: Tom Henderson <tomhend@u.washington.edu>
To: hipsec@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.01.1507221722230.19296@hymn02.u.washington.edu>
User-Agent: Web Alpine 2.01 (LRH 1302 2010-07-20)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.7.23.1216
X-PMX-Server: mxout22.s.uw.edu
X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_1000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_600_699 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_URI_IN_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HTTPS_URI 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __MULTIPLE_URI_IN_BODY 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __TO_NO_NAME 0, __URI_IN_BODY 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0, __URI_NS , __USER_AGENT 0'
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hipsec/u7Sq9qnOyAGXAUrTe3tAkSUV4YY>
Subject: Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09.txt
X-BeenThere: hipsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This is the official IETF Mailing List for the HIP Working Group." <hipsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hipsec/>
List-Post: <mailto:hipsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/hipsec>, <mailto:hipsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 00:23:07 -0000
On 07/22/2015 03:46 PM, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > > > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis/ > This draft version provides some new text regarding the double jump mobility problem, which is listed as one of the open issues on this draft: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/hip/trac/ticket/12 This is in the new section 3.2.3 linked below: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-09#section-3.2.3 Comments/review would be appreciated. Otherwise, the rest of the draft is a refresh. - Tom
- [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-0… internet-drafts
- Re: [Hipsec] I-D Action: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-b… Tom Henderson