IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Security goals

Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com> Tue, 13 March 2012 06:05 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D6B521F8820 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.115
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.115 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.484, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gFF12XVjlDvL for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-4.cisco.com (mtv-iport-4.cisco.com [173.36.130.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0816D21F881D for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:05:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=fred@cisco.com; l=975; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1331618728; x=1332828328; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7Wxjz+mNSla1847MkiBfPQJFbjjvtF1ESI3xc1UmL1M=; b=LRk/q6uaKHJIRc1Vh/C4xIBvAnR2iMhNywoUd86fogUXraHbAjUX/dyo RltKeg+HuU0mEEsdMyyuZd6dTffBjDKzJwny0sEwYbC8y4mzcL+Mljz4y 9jSsQB6A9dOjm8plU6uOsUZXR/57f8w+EYQjVUMg7sDB1GUAjLelfPBW+ s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av0EADLjXk+rRDoI/2dsb2JhbABDtWGBB4IKAQEEEgEnMQ4QC0ZXBjWHZwydVgGfE5ACYwSIVYx6hWmKOoMF
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,575,1325462400"; d="scan'208";a="35743792"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Mar 2012 06:05:27 +0000
Received: from stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com [10.32.244.218]) by mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q2D65QJE014803; Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:05:27 GMT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com (PGP Universal service); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:05:27 -0700
X-PGP-Universal: processed; by stealth-10-32-244-218.cisco.com on Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:05:27 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <854C4D43-EB21-41DF-9DB4-1CCE761358AD@twcable.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 23:04:35 -0700
Message-Id: <FE30689C-CC2F-4C93-ADEE-D470825E9DDB@cisco.com>
References: <AD35BB69-11F8-4AAA-BF7B-D320F646C867@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|cebcb0969667b83ecc4ef8cd422eb095o2A15q03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|AD35BB69-11F8-4AAA-BF7B-D320F646C867@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <0B8FB2ED-E7B8-469E-B76F-26B0A687624E@cisco.com> <854C4D43-EB21-41DF-9DB4-1CCE761358AD@twcable.com>
To: "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, security-ads@tools.ietf.org, "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] Security goals
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2012 06:05:28 -0000

On Mar 12, 2012, at 7:27 PM, Howard, Lee wrote:

>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-opsawg-firewalls
>> "On Firewalls in Internet Security", Fred Baker, 20-Jan-12
> 
> Any chance of having such a conversation in the Security Area WG?  I mentioned the debate to Sean Turner (Security AD), and he thought it would be an excellent topic for security experts to discuss.  However, since there had been no discussion on list, I did not get around to writing a draft, so I have nothing to submit for the agenda.

I'm willing to enough to have the conversation there. I'd just like to have the conversation, as we seem to throw bats around regarding firewalls with ever really reaching a conclusion beyond "they are a market requirement regardless of what anyone thinks about them technically".

opsawg chairs, the issue is that homenet and opsawg conflict and I don't do a very good imitation of myself in a separate working group.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email