IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Next steps for draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap?

Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> Fri, 22 February 2013 17:24 UTC

Return-Path: <mark@townsley.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E148021F8D0B for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:24:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JuvpWnrT5w70 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com [209.85.212.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE8621F8CFC for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:24:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id hm14so1221623wib.3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:24:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date :cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer :x-gm-message-state; bh=8p6hQrhxdBNoV0s6ybISaiAuhnWYToRiTLA2Fd4Tm/I=; b=JYNU7cHFADzb2Eb70B/+sRablS64wydC+bC/vtrJAZP+aGXNL61mDeu6itA+Lw4n1m rMXOsutcussLqGVEvauYaU91Co1wUxLxlVh/8GctXoZd23jdP5/Csi9gDoblIvG7rvlb 23NEcfMwWNkys58Cd/QbCoj1Ydcha1eimjjNitb5OHIP7lyHexftDxuShW3M+DdXxjd+ ulDTKx443QBOBE7DqXqSK4Z38/Rt9eh1HNQERfX3DKGzEmaV51nCU0NP5WV7mAfEFdUc Io4DR+I/yVRc+5QFW/q9QiIEyVbNIP/PDu39Z+0Hio2EAKjHJ/19i0nwTuTFDwG31ksz CLNQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.108.229 with SMTP id hn5mr5141918wjb.8.1361553883440; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:24:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-townsley-8913.cisco.com (64-103-25-233.cisco.com. [64.103.25.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o8sm5129300wix.7.2013.02.22.09.24.42 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:24:42 -0800 (PST)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>
In-Reply-To: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF0F6D5EF0@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 18:24:39 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D0E7A867-0300-49B6-93D4-4D30A61D7BAB@townsley.net>
References: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF0F6D5EF0@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
To: Michael Behringer <mbehring@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnwa1eQ6pOHQY8Y5btioapqmwdhzfc0PGIAkgnHT8WK7VrF5LT4cytWYOk+4T665xFKCO7l
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>, "draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap@tools.ietf.org" <draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Next steps for draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 17:24:46 -0000

On Feb 13, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Michael Behringer (mbehring) wrote:

> Homenet WG, 
> 
> In Atlanta we presented draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap-00, which explains (high level) how trust could be bootstrapped in a homenet environment. 
> 
> The feedback we got during the meeting was mostly positive; we would like to understand the next steps for this draft? We believe this is a useful approach, and would like to have the document accepted as a WG doc at some point. 
> 
> What is the next step? 

Ray and I are open to more WG discussion on this given the positive reception at the last meeting, but I'd rather see more discussion on the list beforehand. Where do *you* see this model fitting in?

- Mark

> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email