IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Next steps for draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap?

"Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com> Thu, 14 March 2013 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <mbehring@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C9C11E813D for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:03:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z6KpxTXWhubV for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:03:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 040E711E8110 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 10:03:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=708; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1363280591; x=1364490191; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=QJPl/WDEHxfbBy6jTblvLyYF/VY5/RL9pBUPqFaw3fI=; b=kVXhELOBkTfHTiiuKcNDiiupof6xQVYY1Z78BZSc4/zxW/+im3HupIrg DNFtY+u7fzx+HuZM3pkUN9bjY57Ai0u3Y506rxraUGwzeTQ2oRORQhaMT 7OUL6NO2LEfgtk5KEFj7nGfGYXAZ4duVLfLBSTzjEvDEoOGBK/IouoEKu c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisFAKQBQlGtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABDh2W9GoFlFnSCKwEBAQMBOj8FCwIBCA4HDRQJBzIUEQEBBA4FCBOHcwbCCo5fMQeCX2EDp1qDCoIo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,845,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="187314918"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Mar 2013 17:03:10 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com [173.36.12.83]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2EH3AW3028128 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:03:10 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.51]) by xhc-aln-x09.cisco.com ([173.36.12.83]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 12:03:10 -0500
From: "Michael Behringer (mbehring)" <mbehring@cisco.com>
To: Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>
Thread-Topic: [homenet] Next steps for draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap?
Thread-Index: Ac4gyjI7rRa09jDESjm4TcI0Yw8B/QAKw4sAAAgh9XA=
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:03:09 +0000
Message-ID: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF0F6ED79F@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
References: <3AA7118E69D7CD4BA3ECD5716BAF28DF0F6ED6C6@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com> <5141F140.2070508@mtcc.com>
In-Reply-To: <5141F140.2070508@mtcc.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.83.162]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Next steps for draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 17:03:15 -0000

> From: Michael Thomas [mailto:mike@mtcc.com]
[...]
> In today's world access control is gated at L2 via wpa or similar. Are you
> suggesting that we have a L3 equivalent? In addition? In replacement?

We need a solution to this problem. I think this is the first important thing to note, and so far it isn't noted (or I missed it). Which solution is open for discussion. 

Can we agree thus far? 

Then, the referenced draft [draft-behringer-homenet-trust-bootstrap] is what we were thinking about, high level. We're happy to work on a more detailed version of what we're proposing, but before we'd like to understand whether it's actually in scope or not? ;-) 

Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email