Re: [homenet] regarding recursive DHCPv6-PD

Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@gmail.com> Wed, 07 November 2012 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <andrewmcgr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2354B21F8C4C for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:05:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YDoBnEEJJkIn for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:05:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pb0-f44.google.com (mail-pb0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F3A21F8903 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 7 Nov 2012 08:05:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ro8so1366912pbb.31 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:05:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=r3juZBVMYd6mVmDg6fLt26/IOYrPDAgIqM2owpXtEww=; b=xmtrI7CP1F70fKOolHgPrDFZAKIYf8f7VXj1BmEPvDhRmGPbHHydbQXWRDn5J90TiT VvmGH8JKFhx0mo3Sa0qNyr4nDNjOupZ9jk7SUs9+L7+t6rrXWGz6iFZiIeLZnf5TN9L6 iSvskGfGDMqQ2ENoOnGpb9HwZoAeRt0fjpKsuSy8OhorVrhV7+oQTFPrwawrrax010sm LfRfhRDtmFdeGhXi0hXbulK+AK5gESAaxrt9wAD848GAeLyeBGeXniPAgQNyHWFpQWYH AwpxVkIJWu6Mll5EPby9cK4s3WBboOIbnXWiy3O2OyUYT8m+DN9C0hZH6qyOorRDyUg6 E6KQ==
Received: by 10.66.84.40 with SMTP id v8mr13625741pay.47.1352304353663; Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:05:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp-6425.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-6425.meeting.ietf.org. [130.129.100.37]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hs1sm14328131pbc.33.2012.11.07.08.05.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 07 Nov 2012 08:05:52 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Andrew McGregor <andrewmcgr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9986DBDC-EC26-4C6E-972F-90FE52198734@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 11:05:47 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EED03F88-F7CB-4C46-AD92-E1CE0023A7D5@gmail.com>
References: <9986DBDC-EC26-4C6E-972F-90FE52198734@gmail.com>
To: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] regarding recursive DHCPv6-PD
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2012 16:05:56 -0000

Nice.  Yes, that's a reasonable way to do that.

Recursive PD seems to inherently need some administrative input.  BTW, our switch implementation can do either.

Andrew

On 7/11/2012, at 10:51 AM, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

> Clarifying my remarks at the mic...
> 
> Using PD in a home network isn't hard.  Use a single delegating router; most obvious choice is the device that received the prefix from the external source.
> 
> Every other router acts as a requesting router, and asks for a single /64 for each of its interfaces from the delegating router.
> 
> draft-baker-homenet-prefix-assignment-01 has more details.  Read it before you flame me.
> 
> *Recursive* PD is, indeed, harder.  Don't do it.
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet