IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] security work items - what do we want to do?

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 24 January 2018 13:34 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1282212422F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 05:34:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NGKhPMJC13FX for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 05:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00::f03c:91ff:feae:de77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E022124207 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 05:34:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (bas1-ottawa08-70-26-10-133.dsl.bell.ca [70.26.10.133]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEE361F960; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:34:03 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id 3E5BE2415; Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:32:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
In-reply-to: <00a33dc6-ad12-3a9b-cdab-086268a45882@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <cd3042c4-e213-feb2-47ea-00f5fb6ab3ab@cs.tcd.ie> <3348.1516762103@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <00a33dc6-ad12-3a9b-cdab-086268a45882@cs.tcd.ie>
Comments: In-reply-to Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> message dated "Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:23:07 +0000."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 08:32:58 -0500
Message-ID: <10646.1516800778@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/5vrFh9iSeMkZd6ohVgNwXMrODrM>
Subject: Re: [homenet] security work items - what do we want to do?
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2018 13:34:08 -0000

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote:
    > On 24/01/18 02:48, Michael Richardson wrote:
    >>
    >> Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> wrote: > - Does this sound
    >> roughly right or off the wall?
    >>
    >> It sounds right.  I think that bootstrap of security should become an
    >> recharter item in the future.  Some kind of BCP on interactions with
    >> MUD, SUIT, etc. IN THE FUTURE. NOT NOW.

    > Can you say more? Eg. what would be needed before you think it'd be
    > sensible for homenet to start work in this space?

a) finish (really finish) Babel work, that might mean interacting with BABEL
   WG

b) DNS naming and delegation in Last Call.

c) ANIMA and related groups publish *managed* enrollment,
   so that HOMENET can consider how *unmanaged* enrollment might work.

    >> > 2. We have this milestone in our charter:
    >>
    >> > "Nov 2018 - Submission of the perimeter security draft > to the IESG
    >> as Informational RFC"
    >>
    >> Yes.  Are the authors still engaged?

    > I'm not aware that we have authors;-( I guess someone could have
    > volunteered in the past before I was helping out as chair (if so,
    > please do let us know).

Ah, so it was Erik and some other people.  I see that the draft has even
expired.  I'm thinking about: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kline-homenet-default-perimeter/
Maybe you are thinking about something else?

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network architect  [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email