IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] renumbering the IETF

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 23 February 2013 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15BC21F8F29 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:37:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -100.825
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.825 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id naLzObqSFcMc for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:37:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f54.google.com (mail-wg0-f54.google.com [74.125.82.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDB121F865D for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:37:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id fm10so1439973wgb.9 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:37:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/9uZVb439XQB/zAhpTO6QAAqJqbBnJEnMT4f3qrftTw=; b=ZOQLrKx8e5/kjxh+ukrIZchiJZbXvPNfAMEbVT25MEu9wPN9vE0MHQ6FYC0e5vSXOE PsSYtBRywMKLpGZZkCAZaCzm1u2jLkleOkBIgAunRRPLgb5GgTOFARVI8L0SxggyzES7 PjsGrlO1Ic5q4xI5vrhGsMoRrSRlOIhGfTRFLogTm3fULxcMCqny9gZ+Dzzake/Yhjny 9Llc5xdZmEpjn119DIJYufJ9sYUhQ6zW6Ulr5f9J10G8jhS8lCgpeT+wvN+Y+Qmeq782 73XkQkOGudttqtB1JzLXeIFSwq7g2waOFIZTJxT9H0aaAv0FPcP88GCBhnbGi6QXbMij J/aQ==
X-Received: by 10.194.19.97 with SMTP id d1mr10342176wje.52.1361648220165; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:37:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-216-117.as13285.net. [2.102.216.117]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id bj9sm5273450wib.4.2013.02.23.11.36.56 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 11:36:58 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <51291A69.8040407@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:37:13 +0000
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <CAKD1Yr19paD4W-Ls1xsunYCBmPKRNoWiO1XNbAaw2Jm5a7VhvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxr_LBMQsxE7QQzdibrwNXS4WuAEd7Wu4kOWiDxgZFkwWA@mail.gmail.com> <51287D7A.60300@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51287D7A.60300@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:24:32 -0800
Cc: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, Michael Thomas <mike@mtcc.com>, Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net>, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>, "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>, Erik Kline <ek@google.com>, "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, David Lamparter <equinox@diac24.net>, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [homenet] renumbering the IETF
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 19:37:01 -0000

Michael asked:

> Given happy eyeballs, how will we measure the impact of a v6-only
> renumbering?

By a reduction in IPv6 traffic after the event?

In any case, to some extent it's a pass/fail test (where "pass" = "no complaints").

Regards
   Brian

On 23/02/2013 08:27, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> On 23/02/2013 05:53, Erik Kline wrote:
> ..
>> I wonder if we should ask the NOC about performing a renumbering
>> during the next IETF meeting.
>>
>> Ideally, we should be able to perform one or two (or three)
>> renumberings in a week, glean the relevant operational experience, and
>> send a draft to v6ops shortly thereafter.
> 
> Great idea. I won't be in Orlando, but I am fairly sure there is nothing
> I would do there that cares about address persistency, apart from
> having to reconnect to jabber maybe. Conducting an RFC 4192 procedure
> on Tuesday night and a flash IPv6 renumbering during Thursday morning
> would be very interesting!
> 
> At least Skype will not be a problem during IPv6 renumbering.
> 
>     Brian
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email