IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] renumbering the IETF

Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> Mon, 25 February 2013 22:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4DC21E80F6 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:54:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.172
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.172 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.173, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rZdw77nXev0x for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:54:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [IPv6:2001:630:d0:f102::25e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC7621F9211 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 14:54:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (localhost.ecs.soton.ac.uk [127.0.0.1]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1PMsQD3010334 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:54:26 GMT
X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.2 falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk r1PMsQD3010334
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=ecs.soton.ac.uk; s=200903; t=1361832866; bh=vSv1xnEBpDMMjTr1zfF8E7lTDMo=; h=Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To; b=vkUyhYoi3+TcvOtC4AuXR62TmNRW3m+1NMnoiSISD5sSUl4OWkEtpyK8FYH4/JzDQ 5L2urcERv2PSSLzDpHfNnPAep96Ez2cpxIm+2Lg1sY0hmOMYGipp6wKGm3+rjlN8ZM tnnT1hk+xtTqcTBNoNAg9En62qJqjumcFhRWzXtE=
Received: from gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk ([2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:401]) by falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk (falcon.ecs.soton.ac.uk [2001:630:d0:f102:250:56ff:fea0:68da]) envelope-from <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> with ESMTP (valid=N/A) id p1OMsQ0430654491Ls ret-id none; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:54:26 +0000
Received: from [192.168.1.103] (host213-123-213-183.in-addr.btopenworld.com [213.123.213.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by gander.ecs.soton.ac.uk (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1PMrwRK007560 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:53:59 GMT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <364CAA7D-4988-462D-B2AA-8729F228884C@townsley.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:53:57 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <EMEW3|637df36ddd8a2b74a3908aec20044a77p1OMsQ03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|08AE2EFA-D7DB-4B52-B8F7-3ABB5CFD6658@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <CAKD1Yr19paD4W-Ls1xsunYCBmPKRNoWiO1XNbAaw2Jm5a7VhvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAAedzxr_LBMQsxE7QQzdibrwNXS4WuAEd7Wu4kOWiDxgZFkwWA@mail.gmail.com> <51287D7A.60300@gmail.com> <364CAA7D-4988-462D-B2AA-8729F228884C@townsley.net> <08AE2EFA-D7DB-4B52-B8F7-3ABB5CFD6658@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
To: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-ECS-MailScanner: Found to be clean, Found to be clean
X-smtpf-Report: sid=p1OMsQ043065449100; tid=p1OMsQ0430654491Ls; client=relay,forged,no_ptr,ipv6; mail=; rcpt=; nrcpt=1:0; fails=0
X-ECS-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-ECS-MailScanner-ID: r1PMsQD3010334
X-ECS-MailScanner-From: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [homenet] renumbering the IETF
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 22:54:29 -0000

On 25 Feb 2013, at 22:17, Mark Townsley <mark@townsley.net> wrote
> 
> On Feb 23, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> 
>> On 23/02/2013 05:53, Erik Kline wrote:
>> ..
>>> I wonder if we should ask the NOC about performing a renumbering
>>> during the next IETF meeting.
>>> 
>>> Ideally, we should be able to perform one or two (or three)
>>> renumberings in a week, glean the relevant operational experience, and
>>> send a draft to v6ops shortly thereafter.
>> 
>> Great idea. I won't be in Orlando, but I am fairly sure there is nothing
>> I would do there that cares about address persistency, apart from
>> having to reconnect to jabber maybe. Conducting an RFC 4192 procedure
>> on Tuesday night and a flash IPv6 renumbering during Thursday morning
>> would be very interesting!
> 
> We might as well toss in some ULAs as well. 

That would be very useful. 

Renumbering tests have been run ten years ago, with good results for the network elements given there's no 'flag day', but not with ULAs in the mix.

So 'flash' renumbering with ULAs in place would be interesting.

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email