IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com> Wed, 09 August 2017 18:37 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BAEE132443 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.199, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VbHZESSTQXYA for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x22a.google.com (mail-lf0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1628132452 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id m86so31608656lfi.4 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 11:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=MdvQGmj+45FsFTWFg2+fdrofs+/7LzZruRdnTEqtWgg=; b=mHi/EXQ8k6V8TTpge+IwgMnG4nLFBsh+GBsIN+bQuEvFh6tGyWIkJnPESzzPGXY/v6 1SpD+buFXGhTT0UF8AnhLoFoII5Dq1M1IsKFUSLjv04sx/ZLKEhEVHnZGUMIAulMo4xp 3aPVm3912JqggdYlqBIoa1YO5A0Bp9LLaN+wZjIXaOrfbF/0/RqxZX4u79pWHl7R+qRf 6OqtG7nJKrAg1eA9pAwIIvyGKtPk9xA4BTgVpGRYvF/IfLCySmq1YBrBujLTaOLkTKZ/ /tX58Pk79rM8Zcmeko0hdc1GxdoriE4ShS+KC3UwgvXyBq1P5LghCC0jUHvu+BAkoPO9 B0sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MdvQGmj+45FsFTWFg2+fdrofs+/7LzZruRdnTEqtWgg=; b=iF74Zyke+3jPBGGIZ283DZm+rDQS8+0rE57oE/mwR7hH6FK5NwGHwUp3JHmtSj2RNW kID4DVPOV6yUOnAPFG6WSlSTcvxdoFyHO/OGHxbkv25ZV6CysWA5cTJ5zqgESeeUH6Xl nqJawyDv8Gk5lfMX14nXShPFURtft4CVWUz1Wq7uyPAd6xfcIgT2W8GmWpujBYfb1V1d vxtI8tZ8Dgwc2lMK+eRKcLFgWp+nfl3vEQuj4sn13x9K793yV5REeU15iVCA9ORpbBN6 4hj53kAxZqopT9K7ftRj+GD1lmYsCemTvYpwPV11xtHt10ZacY/lXGCQlLvAmvAZHdA1 RcAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHYfb5gIvN+XhSBG7JTe86Kna4op0MZu2C/RhcOcofcd6xNB2ywY5s8X 9I7ORUIwNiNMkzC8e+vCPeN0QB5meQ==
X-Received: by 10.25.193.18 with SMTP id r18mr3514577lff.49.1502303815139; Wed, 09 Aug 2017 11:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: mglt.ietf@gmail.com
Received: by 10.46.97.18 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Aug 2017 11:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <19178.1501510069@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
References: <150124709279.25258.15094387920433065465.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBE0147@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com> <12743.1501435181@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <F9E968C3-1EA7-4518-A582-4E5DE923A33E@jisc.ac.uk> <6265.1501464056@obiwan.sandelman.ca> <AF836D5F-3322-4A81-9B7B-77CEADC6AF0C@fugue.com> <19178.1501510069@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
From: Daniel Migault <daniel.migault@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 14:36:54 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: NkTRAGAWmKYLCNS4TRKrfhZKriQ
Message-ID: <CADZyTk=ACnLZiMOuBL_QQq2YjSp0JYnpMeie3mcGXMans7aOBQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1a1ca23f06d10556565d34"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/8hxkfs__jd0fyORUuKNr9JY-S78>
Subject: Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Aug 2017 18:37:02 -0000

Hi,

I apology for the late response (I was off for two weeks). I will update
the draft by the end of the month integrating numerous feed backs we
received.

As a co-author I am supporting the adoption of this document architecture.
I believe that given the current situation regarding homenet and naming,
the simple but useful scope of the draft will help the WG to move forward
regarding naming and home network. I agree the document is not yet in a
final version and feed back from the WG will be very helpful. That said I
think, since last IETF, we have a pretty good view on where we are going.

Yours,
Daniel





On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:07 AM, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

> Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> wrote:
>     > to put the CFA on hold pending that update. There have been some good
>     > comments already, though; in particular, I think Juliusz' point that
> it
>     > would
>     > be nice to actually try some of this in practice is good, and is what
>     > I'm
>
> We require interoperable implementations for Internet Standard, not to
> adopt
> a document.  Implementation reports would be good for WGLC, not here!
> We need to lower the bar here, not raise it.  WGs can abandon documents
> too.
>
>     > That said, what I said in the working group is that we've been
> spinning
>     > our wheels on this for several years, and I wanted to know if the
> scope
>     > of this is reasonable and is what the working group wants to take
>     > on. If it's not,
>     > then I don't actually know how to proceed.
>
> I think that it's the right approach, and given the sort out of the MVDP,
> I support adoption.
>
> --
> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh
> networks [
> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network
> architect  [
> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on
> rails    [
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email