IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Sun, 30 July 2017 17:19 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032FB1200C5 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 10:19:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id q16yYah-eBJV for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 10:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 421751276AF for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 10:19:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.21]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC71E1F8 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 13:21:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C0F8070B for <homenet@ietf.org>; Sun, 30 Jul 2017 13:19:41 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "homenet@ietf.org" <homenet@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBE0147@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
References: <150124709279.25258.15094387920433065465.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E6114DBE0147@GAALPA1MSGUSRBF.ITServices.sbc.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.5.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 13:19:41 -0400
Message-ID: <12743.1501435181@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/EmznLavzz_JyBbSnCmKDYXddKkM>
Subject: Re: [homenet] The HOMENET WG has placed draft-tldm-simple-homenet-naming in state "Call For Adoption By WG Issued"
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Jul 2017 17:19:45 -0000

I have read homenet-naming.

It wasn't quite the document I was expecting.
But rather seems to leverage upon a number of other draft-sctl* documents in progress.

What are the plans for draft-sctl-*?
and then there is draft-ietf-mid-mpvd-ndp-support as a normative reference.
Will homenet will to adopt that too?

So it seems that I have to read the other documents in detail before I can
make any clear opinion as to how this all fits together.
(I think I've missed the last two homenet WG meetings due to conflicts; I
should watch them on meetecho recording to learn more I guess)


--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email