[homenet] WGLC (again) on draft-ietf-homenet-arch

Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk> Wed, 09 July 2014 15:34 UTC

DomainKey-Signature: s=main2.dk.nominet.selector; d=nominet.org.uk; c=nofws; q=dns; h=X-IronPort-AV:X-IPAS-Result:Received:Received:From:CC: Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID: References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language: X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-originating-ip: Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding: MIME-Version; b=u2p1+pyPxrC4r4pzxmWP8R/J4sHe7otTnj1b6IdulIBlQ9fJZx1yLuAQ vKIVzFNjW5s+hWaLMEP9vB4aC0B/Eupfy5tIuL7qOrtPdQiesfx1BzkHX 9W7VkYWlL85sgp3nk27ywtpUqa8uWGHqDBQsZukOHJa+qf3067Dly6Be2 gn9OuQk3/WOX5Vg5I/Rfmhw1iMjY1WnojX6BliFeI7ETpdpzn6pKdpNc/ 7wOsQV4107MmcUXGNjyl4p4LwsuM/;
From: Ray Bellis <Ray.Bellis@nominet.org.uk>
CC: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WGLC (again) on draft-ietf-homenet-arch
Thread-Index: AQHPm4s5+3DYJVuju0q+tiR98vBFvw==
Date: Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:34:08 +0000
Message-ID: <98FCD1E7-0211-4569-ABDA-039A18893FDA@nominet.org.uk>
References: <E24A8D97-B290-4501-9FC6-C6C820229C34@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <E24A8D97-B290-4501-9FC6-C6C820229C34@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <1A8756526F228C4BA1775A0717CCCDC8@okna.nominet.org.uk>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/IgwHpF93hTC8mDjgwG49qk2a-_4
Subject: [homenet] WGLC (again) on draft-ietf-homenet-arch
Precedence: list

On 20 Jun 2014, at 06:07, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> wrote:

> As Tim mentioned a couple of days ago, there has been some productive discussion about how to fix the routing section of the architecture document so that it satisfies the concerns that were raised during IESG review.   Ray Hunter posted a nice list of questions; I've asked him to produce a first draft of a new version of this section.
> 
> Once that's done, Tim will hold the pen on the text, and I would obviously appreciate any feedback people can give on it.   The text from Ray will be a starting point, so if it's not what you think it should be, please explain why and (if appropriate) send text.
> 
> As I mentioned earlier, this will not be open season on the document—the IESG has already reviewed it, and making substantial changes at this point that aren't addressing points raised in the IESG review is out of scope.
> 
> Thanks for whatever remaining patience you have to offer on this topic.

draft-ietf-homenet-arch-17.txt, which contains the new text on routing that Ted is referring to below, was published Friday.

A diff from -16 is available at:
http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-homenet-arch-17

This email commences a 2 week last call, ending Wednesday July 23 during the IETF meeting in Toronto.

In parallel, we would like to ask Ted to review this new version with which ever members of the IESG he deems necessary for additional review and potential change of ballot position. If the document passes this WG last call as well as any AD review by July 23, we will ask Ted to advance the document before our meeting on Friday, July 25.

As with the previous WGLC (albeit that was effectively immediately rendered moot by the WG’s unanimous rejection of the routing text that WGLC is the changes to section 3.5.

thanks,

Ray and Mark

[homenet] Moving forward with the routing section… Ted Lemon
Re: [homenet] Moving forward with the routing sec… Ray Bellis
[homenet] WGLC (again) on draft-ietf-homenet-arch Ray Bellis
Re: [homenet] {Sender Address Possibly Forged} WG… Ray Bellis
Re: [homenet] WGLC (again) on draft-ietf-homenet-… Brian E Carpenter