IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Mon, 30 November 2015 09:00 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1251B2D12 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:00:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.536
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.536 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qwaxglCWY7Dt for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 06B1D1A8ADD for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 01:00:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 08629A2; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:00:33 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1448874034; bh=XAhgu1Qyld8lCSeBZtuAlhK2KDvnffXbq5SQQrhhBQg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xncVGQSy/RR5iRVjuBeTf09TQRzXLmS/3FfLHXYFxrXiL5deLzROY458XakykjBF4 V2ce0kxBrsBJNJJrLDQtXLrfgEoOLsN/fLFeSOHOgnNNexypUucGgxGQTz4qgsJtZB KxQN0xYfL+1YWEQ+niKpPiPYkENZ2wkl2CXPPtno=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E4EA1; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:00:33 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 10:00:33 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6UP+xSqbd1WBzGYEirkM+27s5-jXfAvjLfhJJVt9mvnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511300951480.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20151016113242.29159.37112.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5620E158.4000309@openwrt.org> <56265237.8020202@gmail.com> <56571260.6040504@globis.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511261610310.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5658D282.1040006@globis.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511300831000.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAA93jw6UP+xSqbd1WBzGYEirkM+27s5-jXfAvjLfhJJVt9mvnQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/OHnVTdf5gkVVPK6MHbSBJNml8-c>
Cc: "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:00:38 -0000

On Mon, 30 Nov 2015, Dave Taht wrote:

> I vote for moving /128s. This could even be a staged thing.

Yes, it could be. I would be interested in numbers on the interruption 
time compared to an L2 solution when doing handovers. Also, how much 
complexity is needed for the whole DAD proxy thing? What do we do with 
IPv4, wouldn't it be easier to give each client a /28 or something, so we 
don't have to implement IPv4 proxy-arp and all that stuff as well?

It sounds to me that giving each client a subnet and not have to do the 
inter-AP DAD/proxy arp thing would greatly reduce complexity?

I have 3x WDR4900,2x WNDR3800 and 2x WRT1200AC to play with. If someone 
has code, I can do tests.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email