Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt
"Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net> Fri, 27 November 2015 22:00 UTC
Return-Path: <v6ops@globis.net>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C821ACD9A for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:00:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.481
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.481 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_D=0.765, FH_HOST_EQ_D_D_D_DB=0.888, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, HOST_EQ_STATIC=1.172, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GtBOxo4hSIbO for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:00:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from globis01.globis.net (092-111-140-212.static.chello.nl [92.111.140.212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48E91A9078 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 14:00:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 386B64034F; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 23:00:39 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at globis01.globis.net
Received: from globis01.globis.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.globis.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J7kuRM2focLP; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 23:00:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Rays-MacBook-Pro.local (178-84-244-32.dynamic.upc.nl [178.84.244.32]) (Authenticated sender: v6ops@globis.net) by globis01.globis.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5915F40346; Fri, 27 Nov 2015 23:00:36 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <5658D282.1040006@globis.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 23:00:34 +0100
From: "Ray Hunter (v6ops)" <v6ops@globis.net>
User-Agent: Postbox 4.0.8 (Macintosh/20151105)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <20151016113242.29159.37112.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5620E158.4000309@openwrt.org> <56265237.8020202@gmail.com> <56571260.6040504@globis.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511261610310.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511261610310.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------070501060100060607040405"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/qcKuCW6kcNULF7v8MQqBEH-7eSQ>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Nov 2015 22:00:43 -0000
> Mikael Abrahamsson <mailto:swmike@swm.pp.se> > 26 Nov 2015 16:15 > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015, Ray Hunter (v6ops) wrote: > >> I have read this draft and find it interesting. >> >> The use of host routes would seem appealing to avoid >> 1) any need for stateful "home agent" and multiple forwarding >> 2) renumbering of the end nodes when roaming >> 3) relatively small number of hosts compared to the complexity of the >> topology >> >> Use of RFC7217 addresses would seem appropriate, but that assumes >> that DAD really is reliable at the time a node attaches to the >> homenet for the first time. > > Wouldn't it be better to adopt > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-host-addr-availability-02 > and just give every device its own /64 and move that around? > Having a full /64 would seem attractive (for maintaining outbound sessions on temporary addresses etc.) How would you "move a /64 around"? I'm presume cooperating routers would have to maintain a translation table of MAC address to /64 prefix per host wireless interface. What's the practical difference with moving a /64 (which still requires routing changes AFAICS) compared to moving a /128 host route? What's the practical difference in the trigger for executing the move (ND neighbor table update, as opposed to a MAC being detected as having changed attachment point)? > My worry about the whole L3 approach is how long does it take to > re-establish packet flows after the L2 wifi handover between APs > compared to an L2 only solution? > >> What's the benefit/downside of this approach compared to having >> roaming nodes actively take part in the HNCP acting as "multi-homed >> routers" with an internal (invariant) /64 VLAN used to bind to >> applications? > > I'd say this approach adds one more layer that needs to come up before > packets can start flowing again, especially since it would require > routing protocol participation as well, I'd imagine. > > If 802.11 can assure L2 handover in 1 second (I don't know how long > the handover time is, just guessing), how much are we willing to add > in time because of L3 mechanisms added on top of this, before packet > flows are up and running again? -- regards, RayH <https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Steven Barth
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Ray Hunter (v6ops)
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Michael Thomas
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Ray Hunter (v6ops)
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Dave Taht
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Ray Hunter (v6ops)
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Ray Hunter (v6ops)
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Steven Barth
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Dave Taht
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Tore Anderson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Dave Taht
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Dave Taht
- Re: [homenet] low latency handovers in wifi (was:… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-… Juliusz Chroboczek