Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Mon, 30 November 2015 08:34 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A491ABC0F for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:34:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8ZzTbCTQo9vf for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 46C441A9301 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obbww6 with SMTP id ww6so121308515obb.0 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:34:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/bXf+kym5yzlORbkOBEqUsIM3R78zoPGKjrlLlaNJyQ=; b=l33CgJEOCCgKhgTRBYGLqjx7GqYDtiLYpxTTk4lzauqFW42J2OY5ouX8EWepViCbHK qlSiW3SYIMi04qszVF52sY27DfEU2YhaBTceUsmCM36lbsMPwM78QPjrljjZqN2nczO+ v0lH7AUK8FRBw0LZkAJBHDDA86LfN5NZgyB/86lPsGzup58h/dzgVHLPIN/6dQT80cEw Cg7Y9igj248rM5yIP7bMhQFDliXJxktuXVPyLPwnlH0PENxpJBHQfQ5ZO+FF+2/oWjPA Yevc4HLfka+nJ8Kp9nmT8iY/ktlOaLZ02CNe0JgE+edxw/6te5Z6n/67MrbnaBmIRNO1 Xjmw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.60.39.200 with SMTP id r8mr29469308oek.81.1448872472747; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.202.187.3 with HTTP; Mon, 30 Nov 2015 00:34:32 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511300831000.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <20151016113242.29159.37112.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <5620E158.4000309@openwrt.org> <56265237.8020202@gmail.com> <56571260.6040504@globis.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511261610310.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se> <5658D282.1040006@globis.net> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1511300831000.24520@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 09:34:32 +0100
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6UP+xSqbd1WBzGYEirkM+27s5-jXfAvjLfhJJVt9mvnQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/d4yCG2g-d7_1VG73fHq6Xy0u3FI>
Cc: "Ray Hunter \(v6ops\)" <v6ops@globis.net>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] New Version Notification for draft-barth-homenet-wifi-roaming-00.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2015 08:34:34 -0000

Dave Täht
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
https://www.gofundme.com/savewifi


On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 8:33 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2015, Ray Hunter (v6ops) wrote:
>
>> How would you "move a /64 around"?
>
>
> Well, the same way you would move a /128 around I guess.
>
>> I'm presume cooperating routers would have to maintain a translation table
>> of MAC address to /64 prefix per host wireless interface.
>>
>> What's the practical difference with moving a /64 (which still requires
>> routing changes AFAICS) compared to moving a /128 host route?
>
>
> None, apart from that a host seldom has a single /128 but instead several
> /128:s. The biggest upside is that you don't need to do DAD handling between
> participating wifi routers (since the host is alone in the /64, there is no
> need to do inter-router DAD).

I vote for moving /128s. This could even be a staged thing.

>
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet