Re: [homenet] Simple Naming and DNS Privacy

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Fri, 23 March 2018 11:41 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8E8A12D7F3 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 04:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dsN5_jsKr5KH for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 04:41:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB51312D779 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 04:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id b136-v6so2222519iti.3 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 04:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ltp3r3/iokWtIuu0hBN5RPlEhmZpwCpZASilK1VQS7g=; b=Z/Ffp9zwqTeqdFLuZO6Yoth8EYnsMdzMeIrkaWkeOvQHrtCK6adHlSJHotEjUcrcIn EotOfj/XNtjixIbS+a3biLyToIx+uBgMHfhnxS5A9NXxNwg+Vrep49Y0z/mOylkO/s2k VaK+sldQF0i8yBm8YD9+9noE2ECvdloD9AEjbNl24f8GhWQRLz8jB14u0MlGWEc5EoNT 4m76GpBp2XHhQz9IW6D39n7Zr937bpUBovACWAFF2sE+BfO7LUTnnLK05ODUb5IT5mv0 cMldKcELdFdk53+AbE4wl91X7wztLAatJG7r/9FrMuWdfcW9OdLHggzLnj3nyUU70DP6 tycQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ltp3r3/iokWtIuu0hBN5RPlEhmZpwCpZASilK1VQS7g=; b=H3uPJBylZZoi4IpOAC8R+32osMshWf1fVPyoaDoZrliJiL4phuTAwKOT9FKWDVp9Pg GUve2pBHyfRlj4sJ+UcyaCuYCVNPkai+pvCS+kF+oXUprWi8nMpkgh7ulmoBHycHLDnj EcTPVZep0NcWrkL1j1Wia1axtDPHv4sS9L3g0yYzrPeBK0lszeHez67/Dajk3dnSzADR lkjKnDIWnR8PnO8WS/XCEepOMMzhx32fI81JHGUqSqHEGevQgZBIdL+Nle7R3jUoN9V5 kY+5WWAcaGehnpx22eLCde3OyX2yhODMBUWke/GbbOfVejuspnjNuVAOhCgOLgNxyPA9 ajYw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7FcOj4NT7TFBgz+8NU0b1iX3Mmr16wwDDPLOgk0f7lcnkTAjZOX op3MFh8nUMUMFxvI8cG+DVe/Rpig0+tEB109MiqLAQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AG47ELtPv73LPA3lfcIeS9m1lG98LWxee4T4o/Dc2bqr60Yo3dlw91mquVPROShrVLm8ZwRsmj8lMN3ypv18rI4yn9c=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:17c4:: with SMTP id 187-v6mr13002037ith.144.1521805282276; Fri, 23 Mar 2018 04:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <MWHPR11MB1581E35107CB4DFBBEE8DC8290A80@MWHPR11MB1581.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <MWHPR11MB1581E35107CB4DFBBEE8DC8290A80@MWHPR11MB1581.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:41:11 +0000
Message-ID: <CAPt1N1n_PQqHe0bgAj_tse3UVEiSQSCvR5zbXRziTXqA57r_3Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Border, John" <John.Border@hughes.com>
Cc: HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000004493b5056812e720"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/QT8IT62dADLCyRb8rrszeCJhCYA>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Simple Naming and DNS Privacy
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:41:25 -0000

I think the right way to approach this question is to try to write a
security model.

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 09:54 Border, John <John.Border@hughes.com> wrote:

>
>      Does the simple naming architecture need to deal with DNS privacy
> using port 853?  Subject to the success of the security boundaries, the
> home network can be considered as already being private to some extent.
> But, my devices are mobile and will move in and out of the home network and
> may have DNS privacy use enabled for outside use.
>
>
> John
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>