IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Egress Routing Discussion: Baker model

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 22 February 2013 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BCF21F8E70 for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:56:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.146
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.146 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.545, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nwgvqq9Z-ZUN for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:56:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f46.google.com (mail-wg0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7336621F8E64 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:56:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id fg15so315033wgb.13 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:56:01 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vh/PDPX8NRp8vVl0u7JiSxqL4oonpByVlNl+UszBSpE=; b=TL/WkcjjTNIblIfCNtAncCo4JzxX8emB67BqTEzfyG1WnVyibqr/GwqktcNnCLxvtM cjZbayZOsnF+Oi7g7b7eewxbpSWPOdSGRCD3QZW/do/u7IM4VdTQ1rfC9JCDDeEUux07 5zesjzznt7nkEwxX1sJsvF7vPsvW2f5I7gflExcTZMUb8gjifQVgjF4r+tdvJ8Ji6UvZ 7mkHDPqC5Z+d8tpDvXrFZv9Vr4G8i8+8WvuDZsfhWQ7fqK/4yCG1UO6H2Q6SKTm8XM3R MgrB0ylPjCDOYNdL5PyeJ3HC3zvVy9BYKYfBtdnNEnOFv5cqaqRXPllJRFYECRk5x327 hi8A==
X-Received: by 10.194.110.69 with SMTP id hy5mr1869091wjb.1.1361523361644; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:56:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-217-222.as13285.net. [2.102.217.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fx5sm2167473wib.11.2013.02.22.00.55.59 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:56:00 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <512732AD.3000003@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:56:13 +0000
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
References: <472E7EB7-E262-46CE-A17E-DE4C45C70566@cisco.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B79DCE3@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B79DCE3@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "homenet@ietf.org Group" <homenet@ietf.org>, "Abhay Roy (akr)" <akr@cisco.com>, "isis-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <isis-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, "ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Egress Routing Discussion: Baker model
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/homenet>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 08:56:03 -0000

On 21/02/2013 19:23, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
...
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-flowlabel-routing
>>  "Using IS-IS with Role-Based Access Control", Fred Baker, 17-Feb-13
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-isis-dst-src-routing
>>  "IPv6 Source/Destination Routing using IS-IS", Fred Baker, 17-Feb-13
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-ospf-dst-flowlabel-routing
>>  "Using OSPFv3 with Role-Based Access Control", Fred Baker, 17-Feb-13
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-ipv6-ospf-dst-src-routing
>>  "IPv6 Source/Destination Routing using OSPFv3", Fred Baker, 17-Feb-13

To get this on the record, I have serious doubts whether the use
of the flow label suggested in these drafts is compatible with
the current flow label standard (RFC6437). I think this is
separable from the general approach, so I'd rather defer
discussion until the general approach has been debated.

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email