IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-22: (with COMMENT)

Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 20 October 2022 13:45 UTC

Return-Path: <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE242C14F74B; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 06:45:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LEoFeHAIBTsV; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd2f.google.com (mail-io1-xd2f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d2f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9B52C14CE2E; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd2f.google.com with SMTP id q196so17172040iod.8; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=t5bmxReJp11yQTlKzmpokL608sE74KCZbAPt5lAONOs=; b=aq26bZ2YV+1DFdJN8W4r8vf3oyBMI+KJcSD78j0Hfc3z/0Qq8G+snTAY13hxeGICNL EQT2ED2dhDDlCyboqc+Bu2GHByEEl+QTHRg2kJ5z8TPafIR/CkjSagCcnTlQ9qdFP1F5 +pIOlo/MXAOyY306l4NoBMYoR66FMUBlH+N1ugh7kBxBMz0J6JpR87Jm47+6BIXG+tKs 4hCccptoOOhWznrDN3czWmXQ9ES1MVh+eGVpdI2keFO+ExuAN+kb4OX9D/BPK1UJmAV1 +XAeoOWes4cGzp+Vy5QsGcvAq15Dd1USc5ctt4GvKwBeTWDW9GLKeWd1nuT6QNiNe8to rqZg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=t5bmxReJp11yQTlKzmpokL608sE74KCZbAPt5lAONOs=; b=sq2cOM1pL/Q41uMEM/kILeInu8swPx5gJfQZ31UNNsVNoIPat3MQzevpwqh+WEnXqe 5en8vhOdY0O508HCuItpLPRUvRUGwMAHmI5X/wJDXyA9COaWUL3rE+qivH79TYERKQJf c8pP0LnfFejbqRjuhOruRsUjW7zIZoSwPg/othQwcUjy+MVn2vAfyD6knTMJ+04ESAGY LaqWt3OGkZGa/gP+cWT+l2iDs8wweXnwvZBrufkbV2mtI2ahwoCdYw6kr+vj8tyxDbga vrYRFRk1BPm7pZis2sC5kOLF1oP/MEoJsQ6fwcqMC+FSXYCk/H4ofwxTkEKnhLbK/6bi x0yA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ACrzQf2ljHYsB+s7WpAUEQkyqTTxpvk+LCGFbxl3G6mZvXqHH9O1IiGw giIDJ7eX0ySWXKeKXAlwdLhMWDfQlgmCZxBTlFbhYP7YBjo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AMsMyM7s2m9r6ksMQLHnt5gnwxTmrMzXTX0Oni1C8dxj/VIgR5iP54WIEDY7OOKrwTXy1ZC0kJw+nBQ38+oOCyuQ6zg=
X-Received: by 2002:a02:cd26:0:b0:363:74f2:6d7b with SMTP id h6-20020a02cd26000000b0036374f26d7bmr10840385jaq.139.1666273540103; Thu, 20 Oct 2022 06:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <166626956413.47121.1883094486087799176@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <166626956413.47121.1883094486087799176@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Daniel Migault <mglt.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 09:45:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CADZyTknxMPyjozSRC=tv6FQhj2KwzYgmNTM2OtDNMeCcugLTBA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options@ietf.org, homenet-chairs@ietf.org, homenet@ietf.org, stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000074e32d05eb778aff"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/rjDrcQzhnXKnipZ_-ty64KRo1TU>
Subject: Re: [homenet] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-22: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 13:45:43 -0000

Hi Zahed,

Thanks for the review.


On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 8:39 AM Zaheduzzaman Sarker via Datatracker <
noreply@ietf.org> wrote:

> Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options-22: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-homenet-naming-architecture-dhc-options/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for working on this document. I am supporting Lars's discuss to
> clarify
> the implication of a non standard port usage.
>
> We only chose to use the standard port. The reason we mentioned this is
that when other transport modes will be used, a standard port will be
defined. Either in the document defining the transport or in a document
specifying the code point for the Supported Transport.


> I also think this paragraph
>
>    It is worth noticing that the Supported Transport field does not enable
> to
>    specify a port and the used port is defined by a standard. In the case
> of
>    DNS over TLS [RFC7858], the port is defined by [RFC7858] to be 853. The
> need
>    for such flexibility has been balanced with the difficulty of handling a
>    list of tuples ( transport, port ) as well as the possibility to use a
>    dedicated IP address for the DM.
>
> should be moved to section 4.4 if this consideration is also true for
> section
> 4.3.
>
> correct. I just copied the lines.

>
>
> _______________________________________________
> homenet mailing list
> homenet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet
>


-- 
Daniel Migault
Ericsson

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email