IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-dot-10.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Mon, 31 July 2017 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: homenet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D5613204B for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:36:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w7VgUISacRdt for <homenet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt0-x22d.google.com (mail-qt0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50C58132046 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id s6so114682154qtc.1 for <homenet@ietf.org>; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=bm6jWiypS2SasYqfFwajGYeSqNMC7D8zrOXSBiXYhEU=; b=q+OoyGIQGApf/vOJeonVHnRf+/QfqwHIMDs2qWOURVMqJMINPlQyWYhwE8R1HOM1nl vBp7GDiZkawhRrVvoH5aPwNQcNscT+NPv3NYMipX6Cg/4kRFComFPwBeqDYzePYDEhqU y2GuHLIH6aNxGNjSAUvvT2/HMKH19ANX3RjR6L/5Sm3C8kX6o5om7hawiusWqC0IxNdB SzM/0P9/AnK04cu9TJGOhP7s+VQXcNzJ9w6W8tKP5A9YrKovvVW16oxx6N+1fuZF2APZ PBlnxpWHHGaEcsrdfHsAjdZVcdNnCZnIrrqnOv0Vp58/K78YknS+iCAGuPqb8tgTeF+s 44yg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=bm6jWiypS2SasYqfFwajGYeSqNMC7D8zrOXSBiXYhEU=; b=OGw7ffbFPmg6qCg81+ko5DUr9iZC2hWFn9i+Jsb4TWa2/+6Tt4aDhEuipnlIIlj/oU sI/6uY7RxEMrz97fo7wytMKx+B7FusXLoJt2m66ZFrlTIqxZihMW9L53qzS7+DXsRQX8 E5Huy2CerqCwl5IuwSxL0Szb3Eia9/iJ5Rlrf1pIgO2WIji3LZ3woqzsHJFxEedZ7sip 8vT7WeoOp4w9D6O6cOJti7mGEksU/DdFE6V5a0M5SjgrJIEggmBXxZ/051Er2m8ezRjE X+9Fz0wPngNxE+8F57X4v94bWUu3ngB5tS+RASd00AGoOZhIJ4NZ/clLeJ+MhCv7mGBw ZfoA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIVw110RpsEgTkULF7QJx11Vz4pfHuC8WAEGis8cFVoOO7fCOY3ObR+o HB3UB7w7NYbJC5BX
X-Received: by 10.200.55.53 with SMTP id o50mr21288285qtb.211.1501493801369; Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.30.153] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y16sm17036638qth.82.2017.07.31.02.36.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 Jul 2017 02:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <916EEEB9-3709-492B-8E19-5C832B11AFC2@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B852ADDF-C0CE-4072-9896-BBA0550326EF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 05:36:39 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20170731050206.1A431806F1C2@rock.dv.isc.org>
Cc: homenet@ietf.org
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <150127266271.25329.18484770769960144@ietfa.amsl.com> <20170731050206.1A431806F1C2@rock.dv.isc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/homenet/w9DDfoFSd2ta9l0virfSyPAEu8Y>
Subject: Re: [homenet] I-D Action: draft-ietf-homenet-dot-10.txt
X-BeenThere: homenet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF Homenet WG mailing list <homenet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/homenet/>
List-Post: <mailto:homenet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/homenet>, <mailto:homenet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 09:36:44 -0000

On Jul 31, 2017, at 1:02 AM, Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote:
> The delegatation is INSECURE and SIGNED not UNSIGNED.  The wording
> here is *important*.

Can you explain what the distinction is, and what the problem is that you see in point five?   The reason I ask is that we explicitly changed the wording from "insecure" to "not signed" because someone else said that it wasn't clear what "insecure" meant.   It seems to me that the current language is explicit and unambigious; I think this is better than being "correct."   So what is the bad outcome that might occur as a result of using the term "not signed" rather than "insecure"?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email