Re: [hrpc] FCC's new Internet regulatory gambit and human rights
Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net> Thu, 28 March 2024 15:12 UTC
Return-Path: <woody@pch.net>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5071AC14F610 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.696
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.696 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=neutral reason="invalid (public key: not available)" header.d=pch.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cib4uAqCGQRb for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from secmail.pch.net (secmail.pch.net [206.220.231.87]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7415C14F5F3 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from secmail.pch.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by secmail.pch.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4V56V61tHFz4xR91 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: secmail.pch.net (amavisd-new); dkim=pass reason="pass (just generated, assumed good)" header.d=pch.net
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pch.net; h= x-mailer:to:references:message-id:date:in-reply-to:from:subject :mime-version:content-type; s=secmail_dkim; t=1711638765; x= 1714230766; bh=Q1oSLQJ0Tkx49AyANysT4ZLRciRkHTr1nD2rTbjfnbU=; b=z imUcSkhQ3PsEKa05FPWOlHQIYLKSmAXl+33kCIbtI+t2icBKmvPu8qJkIojwNnvd HbTuKDyPTtTheLSgZChGw9Nw/J9gkH6VgKkOe/6PxYVD9qZ2wF+ZRnkXMYmkf9As faHuamNr38t0lkquJphESdJimc+RFcF6VOrv1bAA/D9Abjel/oJx1J35nQnL0iUv 6vcj1H/qyk2i6BKruKJBCXRsdrUy/tQETAMXrv5bfP+vxhcwhbfezgfvYBjx6AXL ua5SmhkjOInuI8RPLEVrq4GKgDk4NnyFbwwuHoaWqR1OXanfXH6RUhpumP+DS9S5 MGyMQk0eZCPuvLBT6bpNA==
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at secmail.pch.net
Received: from secmail.pch.net ([127.0.0.1]) by secmail.pch.net (secmail.pch.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id m2vVeEWGji4F for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:12:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (itv-02 [69.166.14.6]) by secmail.pch.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4V56V470D6z4xVTX; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 08:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_636A5290-6484-425E-BE72-DA6F3352A5FB"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.500.171.1.1\))
From: Bill Woodcock <woody@pch.net>
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <1633729151.141406.1711637681285@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 16:12:42 +0100
Cc: rutkowski.tony@gmail.com, hrpc@irtf.org
Message-Id: <DED82366-57B0-4B66-B8B6-F6707F7EB371@pch.net>
References: <659E347E-B474-4CD7-A41E-394BC5B99285@mnot.net> <110ee2ad-fbd4-4917-9464-4fd3e0511d6e@andersdotter.cc> <D216AB41-DE37-4747-A5B1-33B70C121F78@mnot.net> <4ed43236-6061-4d57-aa26-fc9e8b13d499@andersdotter.cc> <CABcZeBMZy0jVDpJpG_vo6DY0KvVN22+GKCyNOPf+0O3NJCU9Sg@mail.gmail.com> <333c35f8-ec94-4cd9-a201-e4e223baf664@andersdotter.cc> <CAGVFjM+=nk+WDy1oPHfr0dK5z7ppEdXbebHSwa06tJRiZLEGhg@mail.gmail.com> <38f5d8a0-86c9-4e26-a75d-0c37615597dc@andersdotter.cc> <9346223d-d0b7-487b-a566-c6464aa31a07@gmail.com> <1633729151.141406.1711637681285@appsuite-gw2.open-xchange.com>
To: Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.500.171.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/3m47tk_la_HFsxTR-ZYsmiiLw6g>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] FCC's new Internet regulatory gambit and human rights
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: hrpc discussion list <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 15:12:51 -0000
> On Mar 28, 2024, at 15:54, Vittorio Bertola <vittorio.bertola=40open-xchange.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > The risk of underfunded, volunteer-based software projects used at large scale is just not socially bearable any more, they think; someone must take liability for their security, which needs to be based on some kind of standard practices. My prediction: If this actually goes where the smug Eurocrats intend, they will congratulate themselves for having solved the problem. Meanwhile, productive European open-source authors will no longer be able to afford the liability of doing what they do, and will either have to stop, or publish from legal entities in the US, where nobody ever has to answer for bad software, ever. Because, you know, then Google and Microsoft and Facebook would face liability, and the USG exists to prevent that. -Bill
- [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regulators' Niels ten Oever
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Adrian Gropper
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Stephen Farrell
- Re: [hrpc] [EXT] Re: 'Technical Standards Bodies … Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Bill Woodcock
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Tara Tarakiyee
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Amelia Andersdotter
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Jens Finkhaeuser
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Mallory Knodel
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… bumblefudge von CASA
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… bumblefudge von CASA
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Adrian Gropper
- Re: [hrpc] A human rights landmark worth celebrat… Jane Coffin
- [hrpc] FCC's new Internet regulatory gambit and h… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Mallory Knodel
- [hrpc] A human rights landmark worth celebrating Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [hrpc] FCC's new Internet regulatory gambit a… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Eric Rescorla
- Re: [hrpc] FCC's new Internet regulatory gambit a… Bill Woodcock
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Bill Woodcock
- Re: [hrpc] FCC's new Internet regulatory gambit a… Tony Rutkowski
- Re: [hrpc] 'Technical Standards Bodies are Regula… Vittorio Bertola
- Re: [hrpc] FCC's new Internet regulatory gambit a… Adrian Gropper
- Re: [hrpc] FCC's new Internet regulatory gambit a… Tony Rutkowski