Re: [hrpc] Organizational questions and new ID

Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> Mon, 07 December 2015 12:25 UTC

Return-Path: <niels@article19.org>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7ED61B31C2 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 04:25:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.424
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.424 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_NEUTRAL=0.779] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35XPLFATCdMN for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 04:25:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.article19.io (vps784.greenhost.nl [213.108.108.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41E441B31B6 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 04:25:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.article19.io (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.article19.io (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C8A2F124037; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:25:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.article19.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7460124033; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:25:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.article19.io ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.article19.io [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id rQ3iM3pCsjHQ; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:25:21 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.1.144] (092-111-144-190.static.chello.nl [92.111.144.190]) by mail.article19.io (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83BAA124036; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 12:25:21 +0000 (UTC)
To: Corinne Cath <cattekwaad@gmail.com>
References: <5661B959.9060502@article19.org> <CAD499e+m6fOPyX-Q8+Stc=wRQL5y7+96-47xQzLejwa2bgSm2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org>
Message-ID: <56657AAF.5040206@article19.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 13:25:19 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/38.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAD499e+m6fOPyX-Q8+Stc=wRQL5y7+96-47xQzLejwa2bgSm2w@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/7dkXc1slrXITxtUjVXRi5Gpgqt8>
Cc: "hrpc@irtf.org" <hrpc@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Organizational questions and new ID
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "niels@article19.org" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 12:25:30 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi Corinne,

Thanks for this!

I reckon you meant IRTF track instead of IETF track, or am I mistaken?

Best,

Niels

Niels ten Oever
Head of Digital

Article 19
www.article19.org

PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
                   678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9

On 12/07/2015 11:04 AM, Corinne Cath wrote:
> Dear all,
> 
> Looks great! I think its a good thing to move the active documents
> to the IETF track.
> 
> Also happy to help with the methodology and report document, or
> other issues as they come up!
> 
> Best,
> 
> Corinne
> 
> On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Niels ten Oever
> <niels@article19.org <mailto:niels@article19.org>> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I hope this email finds you all well. Please find here the next 
> version of the methodology ID, most changes were suggested
> directly before the Yokohama meeting and at the Yokohama meeting:
> 
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-varon-hrpc-methodology-02
> 
> Furthermore I would like to ask the group whether you would all
> think it's OK if we move the current active documents [0] [1] [2]
> over to the IRTF track [3] and make them hrpc group documents,
> since we're chartered now.
> 
> Furthermore I would like to gather input from you all whether
> people would like to volunteer to continue the work in either the 
> methodology, glossary or report document.
> 
> During the Yokohama meeting several suggestions have come up to 
> include more technical analysis (such as DDoS), and we decided we 
> would try to deduce protocol transcending  considerations. Would 
> people like to volunteer for any of these tasks or have other tasks
> / research they think would be appropriate?
> 
> Looking forward to hear what you think.
> 
> Best,
> 
> Niels
> 
> 
> [0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-varon-hrpc-methodology-02 [1]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dkg-hrpc-glossary-01 [2]
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-doria-hrpc-report-00 [3]
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5743.txt
> 
> _______________________________________________ hrpc mailing list 
> hrpc@irtf.org <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org> 
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> 
> 'The management of normality is hard work'
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWZXqvAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpX1YH/jIS5NUZl34QN12/E5K6tTcj
tVzNQQWeQgMCJDR7HGgGBEzJcqDVCsKPT1y8Qev8iCBr4rVWmL1MT5GxYA7AZgKw
zBsSQklGWOo6U7tfaXnU9EZblf5K5wZShTRSx1+7Ogm/QC7f18WnMaxWwVn0wdms
c2uVit+AO0BjujJIA8NboM4JgNZFI2zFyhFSA7Es/pS7lDOecOcQ5mZJG40mIcPH
AwPHfMRaNUhOuZS8lkz+8prvnlo/46l4OtlBsM8fxpNOmPxkieNzrH0yu4ZrctDO
nso7pTeBUknII2Rnfk7X9HK9Mo3OM9QtRNe+UcR1Nffs4fH4JjpRsRZZjNrIxt4=
=EWzQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----