Re: [hrpc] Organizational questions and new ID

Corinne Cath <cattekwaad@gmail.com> Mon, 07 December 2015 10:04 UTC

Return-Path: <cattekwaad@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 341971A033B for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:04:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OnWdsyarMSpY for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:04:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wm0-x22b.google.com (mail-wm0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49761A032D for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:04:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wmww144 with SMTP id w144so143027651wmw.0 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 02:04:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0pa09zfvxu3OFbZVSm6vR0j2FpqFV2co3mXn+hqdf2k=; b=npR9eo+XZiMrqskl4hO3jiLWRK/pa2r/TOOrRFVnR9BL4W6WgcRtQFqJq6jL8RJPti PrhhIIQyZa/f5rhcnZhoul3MO9M/GOi4i9J1Q//poEcz7NZANAozb8XckGiKwCnoWA+r PUHvekPaF+miHc6LVF6+Pl+bjg/XcM6E5XdwYlEU/ORmlzD7zgEIKE/FFrBAspkw9VY/ Vq159fSIt5rdU4odK/41dBVb1Y7gomNxCqZ6/ql2TgcY8TdTim0tZjvU2WrLhtYKfnfH inmRbpGKhVZgIgsE9m/OI1DnZNwmyjZqtxj+usGA9hdgjnwshv3Tyq4PMTh4Om9yzF1z +Gcg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.23.33 with SMTP id j1mr31817563wjf.4.1449482694018; Mon, 07 Dec 2015 02:04:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.89.129 with HTTP; Mon, 7 Dec 2015 02:04:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5661B959.9060502@article19.org>
References: <5661B959.9060502@article19.org>
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:04:53 +0000
Message-ID: <CAD499e+m6fOPyX-Q8+Stc=wRQL5y7+96-47xQzLejwa2bgSm2w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Corinne Cath <cattekwaad@gmail.com>
To: Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f234dd315cf9605264bfd2f"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/xw25iRwhpoa7TIybCoa3YRB_xVA>
Cc: "hrpc@irtf.org" <hrpc@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] Organizational questions and new ID
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "niels@article19.org" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2015 10:04:58 -0000

Dear all,

Looks great! I think its a good thing to move the active documents to the
IETF track.

Also happy to help with the methodology and report document, or other
issues as they come up!

Best,

Corinne

On Fri, Dec 4, 2015 at 4:03 PM, Niels ten Oever <niels@article19.org> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Dear all,
>
> I hope this email finds you all well. Please find here the next
> version of the methodology ID, most changes were suggested directly
> before the Yokohama meeting and at the Yokohama meeting:
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-varon-hrpc-methodology-02
>
> Furthermore I would like to ask the group whether you would all think
> it's OK if we move the current active documents [0] [1] [2] over to
> the IRTF track [3] and make them hrpc group documents, since we're
> chartered now.
>
> Furthermore I would like to gather input from you all whether people
> would like to volunteer to continue the work in either the
> methodology, glossary or report document.
>
> During the Yokohama meeting several suggestions have come up to
> include more technical analysis (such as DDoS), and we decided we
> would try to deduce protocol transcending  considerations. Would
> people like to volunteer for any of these tasks or have other tasks /
> research they think would be appropriate?
>
> Looking forward to hear what you think.
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
>
> [0] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-varon-hrpc-methodology-02
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dkg-hrpc-glossary-01
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-doria-hrpc-report-00
> [3] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc5743.txt
> - --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWYblZAAoJEAi1oPJjbWjpZJwH+gOKCkLKHgmwShrBWYyQBGd3
> y9eO2rUxGMOhE4htEXPlKWAN/Td06SZC9Ml2GQYsKsAlt1upeEzNZWKDF9ejaayZ
> 0DmKOPzmuZTgf6ssSvzCTm+lex5jBtjrHJqd0GuJwCWEWv9OuzRY8PT5i4I8UvJz
> xBwNT+VRHiD3897JdD69+MIgqBz+eUc9oJLdfzPrNUJCBopSJx0Q+U+FlCaINhVe
> xLv0DTghNyD9BMrZ3b6C+38eGtQcsX75jnz0vW93HQVTOFZS6abHYKe/5pLkKbaU
> RafYc8D1K7yVzR5TqhmvhUVHlOntb4b0EGk9WDV9NgF5XqsEVdYy1YU8CADcfBM=
> =pJPe
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> hrpc mailing list
> hrpc@irtf.org
> https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc
>



-- 


'The management of normality is hard work'