Re: [hrpc] I-D Action: draft-irtf-hrpc-political-03.txt

Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net> Fri, 12 July 2019 17:56 UTC

Return-Path: <mail@nielstenoever.net>
X-Original-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85C441204C2 for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3_tKKW7ncb0l for <hrpc@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smarthost1.greenhost.nl (smarthost1.greenhost.nl [195.190.28.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B36CF1200F3 for <hrpc@irtf.org>; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 10:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.greenhost.nl ([213.108.110.112]) by smarthost1.greenhost.nl with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from <mail@nielstenoever.net>) id 1hlzmk-0005Pp-KG; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:56:43 +0200
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 19:56:41 +0200
From: Niels ten Oever <mail@nielstenoever.net>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Cc: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, hrpc@irtf.org
Message-ID: <20190712175641.GB3846@mir>
References: <155810770809.26266.7969582032908863356@ietfa.amsl.com> <405bd4ae-1735-2ddb-d4af-a6314833537a@derechosdigitales.org> <98cc85cf-5c03-1e91-7fe0-746e1ad502e6@nielstenoever.net> <7B65EBFA-4EAA-4010-9D3F-9CC8805AF7D2@cisco.com> <adcd74fc-f536-d861-eb6f-fb0b7acd24ba@nielstenoever.net> <d89f14d5-a421-713e-b3f5-1fe475573fff@cs.tcd.ie>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="O5XBE6gyVG5Rl6Rj"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d89f14d5-a421-713e-b3f5-1fe475573fff@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
X-Authenticated-As-Hash: 54a52893e10ae071b73780542c02a8d9e3f33e6f
X-Virus-Scanned: by clamav at smarthost1.samage.net
X-Scan-Signature: 27b922e39ba943ef41a3b4c3f0284049
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/hrpc/Ft1ovB_VqdiaBeWavrKR7ZNFb5o>
Subject: Re: [hrpc] I-D Action: draft-irtf-hrpc-political-03.txt
X-BeenThere: hrpc@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "mail@nielstenoever.net" <hrpc.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/hrpc/>
List-Post: <mailto:hrpc@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/hrpc>, <mailto:hrpc-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 17:56:49 -0000


On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 04:05:24PM +0100, Stephen Farrell wrote:
> 
> Hiya,
> 
> FWIW, I don't think participation in the IETF is a useful
> question for hrpc, 

I agree.

> though it is a useful question to study.

I agree here too.

> As to a venue, I'd say first do the work required and only
> then bother to worry about venues - if the work is good,
> people will find a place/way to discuss it in the IETF.

I think quite a few of the mentioned things can be shown with BigBang, have a look at the notebooks:

https://github.com/datactive/bigbang/tree/master/examples

> 
> Meanwhile, more specifically...
> 
> On 12/07/2019 12:04, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> > I think the the issue of participation would benefit from its own
> > draft. Ideally it could show several trends:
> 
> Hmm - that "Ideally" is very odd. As I read it (which may
> not be how it was meant) it implies a desire to find such
> trends, which seems like the wrong place to start.
> 

I meant ideally trends would be found and backed up with rigorous analysis, a documented methods, and a dataset so that the expiriment is reproducible. 

> > 
> > - consolidation -  total number of participants/draft authors/RFC
> > authors/mailinglist contributors is affiliated to a low number of
> > organizations - academic exodus 
> 
> "Exodus" reinforces the impression above. 

These were all just hypothesis that one could seek to prove or disprove.

> From my POV I
> have not noticed changes in academic participation over the
> last decade or so, other than perhaps a very small uptick.
> Compared to 20+ years ago, yes, I think there are fewer
> academics at IETF meetings. But I don't have numbers and
> without those none of this can really be properly analysed.
> 
> So, the first step here is not, IMO, asking any powers that
> be, but doing the background work if someone has the time
> and interest. (I'd be interested in the results, but don't
> have the time nor really enough interest to do the work,
> sorry;-)
> 

Am happy to put in work, if other people are interested too. 

Cheers,

Niels

> Cheers,
> S.
> 
> > - decreasing number of
> > participants/draft authors/RFC authors/mailinglist contributors is
> > affiliated with an academic institution - geographical
> > representation - diversity

pub   RSA 4096/7B172BEA 2017-12-22 Stephen Farrell (2017) <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
> sub   RSA 4096/36CB8BB6 2017-12-22
> 




-- 

Niels ten Oever
Researcher and PhD Candidate
DATACTIVE Research Group
University of Amsterdam

PGP fingerprint	   2458 0B70 5C4A FD8A 9488  
                   643A 0ED8 3F3A 468A C8B3