[http-auth] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 01 September 2016 13:20 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <147273604199.10249.8578726802181158917.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2016 06:20:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/EuaT6BhMTGR4tUoIcFULxA3CPM8>
Cc: http-auth@ietf.org, httpauth-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-httpauth-extension@ietf.org, rick.casarez@gmail.com
Subject: [http-auth] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-08: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-httpauth-extension/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

As mentioned by Rick Casarez in his OPS DIR review:

Section 3, paragraph 3:
Some sentence cleanup is required so that this remains clear. I believe I
understand what is being said as far as implementation goes but some
cleanup would make this paragraph more concise.

[http-auth] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft… Benoit Claise
Re: [http-auth] Benoit Claise's No Objection on d… 大岩寛