Re: [http-auth] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-httpauth-hoba-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

On 06/01/15 06:29, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 2015-01-06 04:01, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> ...
>>> And should be in here, as well, to make it clear how the details of
>>> HOBA fit into the framework.
>>
>> Fully disagree. And the author of 7235 who did review this did not
>> suggest that iirc. This should and does correctly require that the
>> implementer has read or is otherwise familiar with 7235. (What you
>> want would also call for every http-auth WG output to include that
>> kind of regurgitation. It's just a bad idea.)
>> ...
> 
> As I'm mentioned...
> 
> FWIW I found the document really confusing as well; 

Hmm. I didn't get that from your earlier reviews. Did I miss
something? If there are specific things are confusing that would
get in the way for an implementer then I'd be glad to know about
those but I thought all the points you raised in your reviews of
this had been addressed.

> a complete example
> exchange of the bits on the wire would be extremely helpful.

Noted.

S.


> 
> Best regards, Julian