IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [http-auth] Authentication-Info

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Tue, 02 December 2014 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4097E1A1BAF for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 06:34:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VfExNA-kqysU for <http-auth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 06:34:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDB881A1B93 for <http-auth@ietf.org>; Tue, 2 Dec 2014 06:34:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.26] ([217.91.35.233]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M7pku-1Y8p6a3coq-00vR91; Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:34:28 +0100
Message-ID: <547DCDEF.30701@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 15:34:23 +0100
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Michael Sweet <msweet@apple.com>
References: <547DB5D1.5040909@gmx.de> <80CDF820-6493-46BD-BB36-2E4990B966DF@apple.com> <547DC889.1070607@gmx.de> <029A2653-2F50-4A75-BEC3-051C3D1CE93F@apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <029A2653-2F50-4A75-BEC3-051C3D1CE93F@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:8iYF/+xAMPjgdOCuYs22oIdkWp4dZRtICWUEt5gnWuVzKprkWck imJFn3PWp5q0XwinzWmq72X3Gqq20BcP2cmbK6e/zZSUiS1w4GRr0G0j8sqzORGDUDCcKSr 6QfCgEm7Q3uOawU6rmTcA8+QQ8FEjfqq3myYw+m/CfdNDiLxMRGDMPVVsRbtFEgBpw6VbPn iGKJbJujlzoL3VDJ85y6g==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/http-auth/KlcG3RbVRIGBKY-NA8dqSYxxq50
Cc: "http-auth@ietf.org" <http-auth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [http-auth] Authentication-Info
X-BeenThere: http-auth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: HTTP authentication methods <http-auth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/http-auth/>
List-Post: <mailto:http-auth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/http-auth>, <mailto:http-auth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2014 14:34:39 -0000

On 2014-12-02 15:25, Michael Sweet wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Changing the syntax sounds like a breaking change to Digest to me.
>
> If optional, it wouldn't break Digest but would not provide a way for new implementations to adopt it.

Let's find out what the syntax variation is about before we start 
planning how to support it :-)

Best regards, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email